Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
London areas in 1891?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
hallyally | Report | 5 Sep 2006 19:49 |
Thanks Helen! Allie x |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 5 Sep 2006 19:38 |
I went to the 1891 census on ancestry and just typed in Kilburn as a keyword. the results show mainly as Willesden though Hampstead crops up a bit. Seems to be Willesden Reg district, Hendon sub-reg district. |
|||
|
hallyally | Report | 5 Sep 2006 19:34 |
Yes, I tried that first.......having a look on google but no luck yet. Allie |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 5 Sep 2006 19:31 |
Remember Kilburn would be considered as Middlesex and not London! |
|||
|
hallyally | Report | 5 Sep 2006 19:30 |
Hi Helen and thanks for that. However, I can't find Kilburn anywhere on the lists! Shall have to google it....... Allie x |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 5 Sep 2006 19:23 |
This is a list of registration districts arranged by county. Put it in your favourites now: www.fhsc.org.uk/genuki/reg/ I can't see Kilburn but would think it would be in Willesden reg district, but definitely NOT Marylebone, which is part of the City of Westminster. |
|||
|
hallyally | Report | 5 Sep 2006 19:19 |
Does anyone know which registration area KILBURN would have come under in 1891? Would it have been Marylebone? Thanks. |