Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Boys name or girls?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
An Olde Crone | Report | 31 Aug 2006 20:18 |
Female spelling of Sidney is Sidonie. Not many people know that. Certainly not the Vicars, the Enumerators or the parents, by the look of things. OC |
|||
|
Kate Shaw | Report | 31 Aug 2006 19:48 |
Thanks a lot Ann! That's really helpful. Ali |
|||
|
Kate Shaw | Report | 31 Aug 2006 19:27 |
Hope you don't mind me asking a Q in a similar vein on your thread Jelly Bean but has anyone come across the name Sydney for a female in the mid 19th century? According to a birth cert it was the name of an ancestor of mine which surprised me (partly because I was sure the mother was someone else!). I have come across it recently as a female name but would generally think of it as a male name. Any thoughts? Ali |
|||
|
An Olde Crone | Report | 31 Aug 2006 18:33 |
Ahem (goes the olde crone, importantly) In my mediaeval researches I have frequently come across the name Kay(e) used as a male name. Never as a female name though. It probably stems from the great land-owning family, the Kayes, or Keyes, who were an established family well before the Norman Invasion. I would think anyone called Kay pre 20th century would almost certainly be male. OC |
|||
|
Kate | Report | 31 Aug 2006 17:40 |
'Jelly', I suppose you mean you are going to order the certificate? Rather than the licence? (By the way, there were not very many girls called Kay in those days, if any, and if they were then it was probably short for something, perhaps Katherine, rather than a name in its own right.) Kate. |
|||
|
Cheryl | Report | 31 Aug 2006 17:23 |
Thanks all. I think I might just send for the licence, the problem is I hate having to wait I want to know now. Best wishes Jelly |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 31 Aug 2006 16:43 |
This is the family in 1891 Emily Clegg 10 >>Ray Clegg 2 Robert Clegg 37 Sarah Clegg 36 Kay Clegg born Manchester 1888 on freebmd Heather |
|||
|
₪ TeresaW elite empress of deleted threads | Report | 31 Aug 2006 16:39 |
Jelly, you can view the image on FreeBMD, jsut click on the little glasses at the end of the search results. Unfortunately it doesn't tell you anything as it is pre-1911 when they started adding the spouses surname. |
|||
|
Cheryl | Report | 31 Aug 2006 16:34 |
I found the marriage on free bmd there is no image to veiw . Iam going to try ancestry. Thanks for the pointers Jelly |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 31 Aug 2006 16:30 |
There's a Kay Clegg, age 12, brother-in-law on the 1901 census. He was born in Manchester. Heather |
|||
|
Kate | Report | 31 Aug 2006 16:25 |
Well, there is Sir Kay in the story of King Arthur, so I guess so. Kate. |
|||
|
Mandy | Report | 31 Aug 2006 16:24 |
Could it be a mistranscription of Ray? Can you view the actual record? |
|||
|
Cheryl | Report | 31 Aug 2006 16:22 |
Does anyone know if Kay can be used for a boys name. I have been looking for a marriage to a Clara Stansfield, I know for sure she married someone with the surname of Clegg. The only one I can find is 1910 which is about right to a Kay Clegg. Has anyone got any thoughts on this. Many thanks Jelly |