Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Help reading 1861 census
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
LB | Report | 26 Aug 2006 19:08 |
|
Thanks for that, I hope you didn't think it was too trivial. I wonder why they just didn't say Granddaughter ort Grandson! Richard must have been a very tolerant father, another of my Grandmother's ancestors had a child outside of marriage and she was banished to the Workhouse and never allowed home again - and that was 40 years later!! Thank again Lyndsey |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 26 Aug 2006 18:57 |
|
It says 'daur son' for the first one (ie, daughter's son) and then do (for ditto) son or do daughter. nell |
|||
|
Wendy | Report | 26 Aug 2006 18:55 |
|
It looks as if it says Daugh son and Daugh daug. Wendy |
|||
|
LB | Report | 26 Aug 2006 18:50 |
|
Hi, it's me again! I'm looking at an entry for Richard Brooks, Meesden, Hertfordshire aged 70, page 7, 2nd household down. Also listed is his daughter Ann and below her, her 4 illigitimate children!! In the 'Relation to Head of Family' column it says something before the word son and it's that word I can't read. I'm curious as to how the children have been described! Many thanks Lyndsey |
|||