Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Always confirm..
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Sidami | Report | 13 Aug 2006 08:27 |
See below |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Sidami | Report | 13 Aug 2006 08:27 |
Commonly Mistaken Assumptions in Genealogy When researching your family history, it is easy to get excited about new evidence and find yourself quickly led astray. While these common genealogical assumptions can provide the basis for a good working hypothesis, they can't be seriously taken as proof without further research. 1) A man's wife or widow was the mother of his children. A man's children could have been fathered by his wife (or widow), a previous or later wife, or even another woman. Parentage is one of those genealogical facts which should never be assumed. 2) If no marriage record is found, the children are probably illegitimate. Early marriages were not always documented. Marriage records may have also been lost due to fire, water damage or neglect. The marriage may have been misfiled, or the record kept in a repository which you have not yet checked. 3) Three men living in the same county, who are close in age with the same last name, are probably brothers. While this is an understandable assumption, these men could actually be cousins, or even unrelated. Look for further corroborating evidence, including the proximity of their homes, common naming patterns among their children, and records in which they are listed as witnesses for each other. 4) That an ancestor named Jr. has a father with the same name. The terms 'Junior' and 'Senior' as well as other family terms such as 'aunt' and 'cousin' were often used very loosely. A designation of Jr., for example, may have been used in official records to identify between two men of the same name, even if they were unrelated (the younger of the two being called 'Jr.'). 5) People followed common migration routes. Just because most of your ancestors' neighbors came from one area 't mean that your ancestors did. While many individuals did follow common migration routes, making this a good working hypothesis, you can't assume it is true without further research. 6) People usually died in their sixties. While most people in a generation may have followed the average life-span, your ancestor may have died very young from illness or accident, or lived to a much older age than many of their contemporaries. Just because your ancestor doesn't appear in the census after their 60th birthday doesn't necessarily mean that they died. Likewise, when a 20-year-old female no longer appears with her parents, it doesn't necessarily indicate that she must have married. 7) An ancestor who was born and died in the same place never moved. It wasn't that uncommon for people to end up back where they started after spending a big part of their life moving around. Family, jobs or money may have caused your ancestors to move many times, but as these requirements lessened as they got older they may well have returned home to live near their family. Create a timeline for your ancestor's life and research their life and activities at many points along the way. 8) A female with the same last name as her father must be unmarried. A common assumption to make, this genealogy premise often proves to be true. However, you need to rule out that the female didn't marry a man with the same surname as her father - a more common occurrence than you may think, especially in areas with a large number of families with the same surname. Alternatively, the daughter may actually have married, and then took back her father's name after a divorce. 9) That an ancestor who disappeared from the records of a town or county must have moved. People aren't the only things that move. Political and geographical boundaries move as well. The county where your ancestor lived may have been divided into new counties, and his records may be found in a different courthouse. Or he may have started traveling to a courthouse in a a neighboring jurisdiction because a new road or other reason may have made that trip more convenient. 10) A male name indicates a male, and female name a female. Names aren't always what they appear. Naming trends change often. The female first name Kimberly, for example, was originally a boy's name. Parents may also have chosen an unusual name to honor an ancestor, a famous individual, or just because they liked it. While assumptions are a necessary part 11) The other point I think is worth mentioning - any census is only a snapshot of who was in the house on that night -and that night only! Because a husband and wife are at separate addresses on a census doesnt mean they are estranged. Because a child is at its grandparents house doesnt mean it lives there permanently. 12)Once you have found what you think is your relative, kill them off, I guarantee it will save hours of research __________________ |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
♫ D☺ver Sue | Report | 13 Aug 2006 08:35 |
All too true, this one must be a typo though: A man's children could have been fathered by his wife (or widow), a previous or later wife, or even another woman. I would never assume that a woman fathered a child LOL |
|||
|
Irene | Report | 13 Aug 2006 09:08 |
I always try and confirm my findings with a birth, marriage or death certificate or baptism records to make sure I am on the right track. It is the only way to confirm these people are my ancestors. Irene |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 13 Aug 2006 10:31 |
Don't ...........!!!!! I have a really really BIG assumption I want to make. I am 90% sure but I cannot prove it............ It's very important and it's been haunting me for weeks!!! *sigh* Bev x |
|||
|
Mystified | Report | 13 Aug 2006 11:41 |
Sue May I add another tip to your very good list? Once you have found what you think is your relative, kill them off, I guarantee it will save hours of research |
|||
|
An Olde Crone | Report | 13 Aug 2006 11:51 |
I can't emphasise John's point enough - kill them off before you do anything else. This will save hours, months, years even, of fruitlessly searching for someone who died aged 2, or 20 or whatever. I speak from experience! The other point I think is worth mentioning - any census is only a snapshot of who was in the house on that night -and that night only! Because a husband and wife are at separate addresses on a census doesnt mean they are estranged. Because a child is at its grandparents house doesnt mean it lives there permanently. OC |
|||
|
Sidami | Report | 13 Aug 2006 12:23 |
Any one else think of anything I can add to this thread. Sue. I have added the last two |
|||
Researching: |