Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Missing from 1861 London census

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

~♥ Daisy ♥~

~♥ Daisy ♥~ Report 13 Aug 2006 12:05

Well that blew that theory then! lol Daisy

Unknown

Unknown Report 12 Aug 2006 23:55

Chatty? Moi??? I feel I must point out that the families I was talking about were my husband's. My rellies were all ag labs until much later on.

~♥ Daisy ♥~

~♥ Daisy ♥~ Report 12 Aug 2006 19:54

Robins and Robinsons not that different really! And my G grandfather Henry married Jane Gibbons whose family were watchmakers! Looks like you and I come from similar stock! Perhaps that's where the chatty gene comes from? lol Daisy

Unknown

Unknown Report 12 Aug 2006 18:23

No, wouldn't it be nice to discover we were distant cousins?! My husband's lot are Robins (the paperstainers) and Denisons (watchmakers). But they lived in a grim area around Whitecross Street and I discovered one of them in Parkhurst in 1871, which is why it would be nice to know where he was in 1861, especially as his wife gave birth in 1866! nell

~♥ Daisy ♥~

~♥ Daisy ♥~ Report 12 Aug 2006 18:09

Thanks Nell. Very frustrating isn't it? No Robinsons among your lot then? Daisy

Unknown

Unknown Report 12 Aug 2006 15:33

Daisy I have missing families in 1861 in St Lukes area - also paperstainers. I think there's a chunk of the census missing. Very annoying as unable to find several family members who then died before 1871! nell

~♥ Daisy ♥~

~♥ Daisy ♥~ Report 12 Aug 2006 14:41

Jools, thank you. I didn't know there were any missing parts so this is very helpful. I have found the rest of the family in parts of Islington in 1861 but he may well be in the missing part which would also account for Elizabeth's absence too. Daisy

Jools

Jools Report 12 Aug 2006 14:31

Was he likely to have been living in one of the missing bits? I've just nudged Sarah Montgomery's thread for you. Jools

~♥ Daisy ♥~

~♥ Daisy ♥~ Report 12 Aug 2006 14:12

Maureen - yes that's him on the 1851. Lyla - yes I've found Jane, Emily and Henry (my g grandfather) all of whom married in the summer of 1852. Anthony isn't with any of them and I haven't found him nearby either. There was another daughter, Elizabeth (married John Stanley in 1949) but I haven't found her yet. Daisy

GlitterBaby

GlitterBaby Report 11 Aug 2006 23:58

1851 just for reference Name: Anthony Robinson Age: 53 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1798 Relation: Head Spouses's Name: Margaret Gender: Male Where born: St Andrews Holborn Civil parish: Saffron Hill Ecclesiastical parish: St Peter County/Island: Middlesex Country: England Registration district: Holborn Sub-registration district: Saffron Hill ED, institution, or vessel: 1f Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 56 Household Members: Name Age Anthony Robinson 53 Emily Robinson 18 Henry Robinson 20 Jame Robinson 25 Margaret Robinson 58 born North Wales, Newingtons Source Citation: Class: HO107; Piece: 1515; Folio: 152; Page: 16; GSU roll: 87849 Maureen

~♥ Daisy ♥~

~♥ Daisy ♥~ Report 11 Aug 2006 22:55

Can anyone help with this please. I have Anthony Robinson (b 1797 St Andrew Holborn) occ paper stainer, on the 1841 and 1851 with wife Margaret (b c1792) and various children. On the 1871 he is in St Luke's Union workhouse listed as a widower, but I cannot find him on the 1861 and believe Margaret died around 1858. Thanks. Daisy