Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Help reading occupation in 1901
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mark | Report | 11 Aug 2006 12:36 |
|
Hi, can anybody help me reading an occupation please? (More ....) |
|||
|
Mark | Report | 11 Aug 2006 12:38 |
|
It is Dinah Mason in Foleshill, Warwickshire - can't read it: Where born: Foleshill, Warwickshire, England Civil parish: Foleshill Ecclesiastical parish: West Longford St Lawrence County/Island: Warwickshire Country: England Street address: Occupation: Condition as to marriage: Education: Employment status: View image Registration district: Foleshill Sub-registration district: Foleshill ED, institution, or vessel: 11 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 54 |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 11 Aug 2006 12:38 |
|
Hi Mark, It wouldn't be 'dead' would it ??? You have my e-mail from yesterday - would be happy to take a look. Dea x P.S. - Sorry, misunderstood - your message hadn't come up yt - I will go and take a look. Dea x |
|||
|
Mark | Report | 11 Aug 2006 12:40 |
|
Good afternoon Dea! No, its not dead - its just that the enumerator has written all over it! Looks like Milk ******le Mark |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 11 Aug 2006 12:42 |
|
milk maid Dea x P.S. - That enumerator was a 'bit of a pain' wasn't he? Dea x |
|||
|
Mark | Report | 11 Aug 2006 12:48 |
|
Thanks Dea - I thought the 'le' was part of the occupation - now that you've pointed it out it, it is clearly part of the enumerator's scribble! Thanks again Mark |
|||