Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

lost them again!

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Carole

Carole Report 6 Aug 2006 17:13

on the 1881 census i found ANDREW SAITE C 1858 living with his father in law ISAAC KAY-my gt gt grandad. Andrew is shown as married to MARY A SAIRE NEE KAY. after that i lose them until 1901. If its them then it gives a different place for birth. they had quite a few kids but i cant find traces of them. I also cant find marriage of andrew and mary and i need this to check them out help!!!!!1 carolexxxx

Elaine

Elaine Report 6 Aug 2006 17:16

1881 for reference Andrew Saite Age: 23 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1858 Relation: Son in Law Gender: Male Where Born: Tranmere, Cheshire, England Civil parish: Tranmere County/Island: Cheshire Country: England Street address: 34 Green Lane Condition as to marriage: Married Employment status: Occupation: Engineer (Maker) Household Members: Andrew B. Kay 9 Eliza Kay 11 Isaac Kay 45 Isaac Kay 17 James Kay 15 John Kay 19 Margaret Kay 43 William Kay 13 William Matthews 25 Andrew Saite 23 Mary A. Saite 23 b Bhead, Cheshire

Elaine

Elaine Report 6 Aug 2006 17:22

Can you give the 1901 details for comparison please.

Carole

Carole Report 6 Aug 2006 17:24

Source Citation: Class: RG13; Piece: 4843; Folio: 46; Page: 11. thanx carolexx

Carole

Carole Report 6 Aug 2006 17:29

seems really weirsd, as not a lot of saite comes up, even with different spellings. i cant find records of birth or marriage for any of the kids either!!! carolexx

Elaine

Elaine Report 6 Aug 2006 17:31

1901 for reference Andrew Sait abt 1854 Warenford Lucker, Northumberland, England Head Adderstone Northumberland Andrew Sait abt 1885 Warenford Lucker, Northumberland, England Son Adderstone Northumberland George Sait abt 1893 Warenford Lucker, Northumberland, England Son Adderstone Northumberland Jane Sait abt 1881 Warenford Lucker, Northumberland, England Daughter Adderstone Northumberland John N Sait abt 1883 Warenford Lucker, Northumberland, England Son Adderstone Northumberland Margaret J Sait abt 1887 Warenford Lucker, Northumberland, England Daughter Adderstone Northumberland Mary Sait abt 1850 Lyham Chatton, Northumberland, England Wife Adderstone Northumberland Mary Sait abt 1888 Warenford Lucker, Northumberland, England Daughter Adderstone Northumberland Robert Sait abt 1891 Warenford Lucker, Northumberland, England Son Adderstone Northumberland William Sait abt 1875 Lyham Chatton, Northumberland, England Son Adderstone Northumberland Ann B Tait abt 1822 Ross, Northumberland, England Head Adderstone Northumberland Dorothy J Tait abt 1864 Warenford, Northumberland, England Daughter Adderstone Northumberland Jane A Tait abt 1857 Warenford, Northumberland, England Daughter Adderstone Northumberland

Elaine

Elaine Report 6 Aug 2006 17:33

You say - they had quite a few kids but i cant find traces of them. Do you know if the 1901 family with all the children is the right one?

Carole

Carole Report 6 Aug 2006 17:37

im presuming its the right one as there isnt any other that looks even remotely like it could be them. its def mary kay/saite but i cant even find their marriage. i know shes right in the 1881 census as isaac kay the younger was my gt gt grandad. its driving me bonkers! carolexx

Elaine

Elaine Report 6 Aug 2006 17:37

Are you sure that the surname is Sait - and not Tait. If you look at the 1901 transcription we have a Sait and Tait family living together. If you look at the image the writing looks almost the same.

Elaine

Elaine Report 6 Aug 2006 17:40

1891 (same family as the 1901 census) Andrew Tait abt 1885 Warenford, Northumberland, England Son Adderstone Northumberland Jane Tait abt 1881 Warenford, Northumberland, England Daughter Adderstone Northumberland John I Tait abt 1882 Warenford, Northumberland, England Son Adderstone Northumberland Margaret I Tait abt 1887 Warenford, Northumberland, England Daughter Adderstone Northumberland Mary Tait abt 1888 Warenford, Northumberland, England Daughter Adderstone Northumberland Robert I Tait abt 1890 Warenford, Northumberland, England Son Adderstone Northumberland Thomas A Tait abt 1879 Warenford, Northumberland, England Son Adderstone Northumberland Andrew Tart abt 1853 Warenford, Northumberland, England Head Adderstone Northumberland Annie Tart abt 1878 Twizell Village, Northumberland, England Daughter Adderstone Northumberland Mary Tart abt 1850 Lyham, Northumberland, England Wife Adderstone Northumberland

GlitterBaby

GlitterBaby Report 6 Aug 2006 17:40

1891 Name: John I Tait Age: 9 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1882 Relation: Son Father's name: Andrew Mother's name: Mary Gender: Male Where Born: Warenford, Northumberland, England Civil parish: Adderstone Ecclesiastical parish: Lucker Town: Adderstone County/Island: Northumberland Country: England Registration district: Belford Sub registration district: Belford ED, institution, or vessel: 5 Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Andrew Tait 6 Jane Tait 10 John I Tait 9 Margaret I Tait 4 Mary Tait 3 Robert I Tait 10/12 Thomas A Tait 12 Andrew Tart 38 Annie Tart 13 Mary Tart 41 Source Citation: Class: RG12; Piece: 4266; Folio 55; Page 18; GSU roll: 6099376. Elaine, I was wondering about the spelling of the name as there is this family in 1891 Maureen Snap, Elaine

Carole

Carole Report 6 Aug 2006 17:40

unless i find the marriage cert i wont know for sure but maybe it couldve been tait and they got it wrong somewhere along the way? very new to all this lol carolexxx

Elaine

Elaine Report 6 Aug 2006 17:43

possible marriage Marriages Sep 1880 Kay Mary Ann Liverpool 8b 85 Tait Andrew Liverpool 8b 85 Don´t ask me why it was in Liverpool !!!!!!!

Carole

Carole Report 6 Aug 2006 17:46

oh my goodness you are just toooo good to be true on here! i cannot believe you found them. i was up till 3am trying to search but got nowhere. didnt even think to try tait and definately tart!!!!! thanx sooo much carolexx