Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Naturalization surnames which would you use ???
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Val wish I'd never started | Report | 6 Aug 2006 23:37 |
thanks for all your replies I am beginning to wish I hadnt found out about the name changes as they seem to have swapped about when it suited them.Oh well who said it was easy????And Chris thats exactly what I have done put them all down under their birth name much easier but they are the only ones on here , which is a shame as I wont get any matches. |
|||
|
Chris in Sussex | Report | 6 Aug 2006 14:47 |
I would check both surnames and the varient spellings of both.....I don't envy you that job :((( As an aside my OH agonised for ages about how to record names for his parents, siblings and himself in his tree. Father married mum and had first son. A year later mum did a 'Mrs Bucket' and had the surname changed by deed poll for dad, herself and son. OH and sister then born and registered in the new surname. Eventually he decided on BIRTH surnames as those are the ones that would show in the registers. Makes the tree look a bit strange 'tho :))) Chris |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
fraserbooks | Report | 6 Aug 2006 14:32 |
My daughter who has a summer job working on the passport advice line says that as long as your ancestor had a birth certificate or other document in his old name he could still legally use it. I doubt if officials actually checked proof of identity. |
|||
|
RStar | Report | 6 Aug 2006 13:07 |
If the name has an unusual spelling, bear in mind that even registrars may have spelt it wrongly on some certs! I have a KRILOVS in my tree, but the registrar spelt it wrongly on his marriage cert, even tho he signed his name correctly. On a death cert, its upto someone else to provide the info...so sometimes mistakes are made! |
|||
|
An Olde Crone | Report | 6 Aug 2006 12:55 |
Valerie Anyone can use any name they like as long as they are not doing so for fraudulent purposes, so the answer to your question is: You will have to look under ALL versions of the name! OC |
|||
|
Val wish I'd never started | Report | 6 Aug 2006 11:56 |
As some of you may be aware I finally found a rellies Naturalization papers on which it also lists 6 of his children living with him at the time, he had at least 10 ,now what I need to know is I can find some of his children under his proper name and some under his new name, would it have been legal to name the children born after naturalization the new name , or would all the children have been legally allowed to use it .As I am having trouble finding some of the births and marriages for instance I have one using his new name but marrying under his old name so confusing, I have to go out today worse luck.So if I am not around will be back later thanks for any replies . |