Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
I know the answer will be no but ........
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown | Report | 2 Aug 2006 20:34 |
|
Just in case I'm mistaken, does the marriage certificate for a woman's second marriage give her maiden name? Thanks,, Bev x |
|||
|
Jess Bow Bag | Report | 2 Aug 2006 20:36 |
|
...you thought you'd ask anyway. you are right ..it doesnt jess Yes...Of course , her fathers name SHOULD be on there |
|||
|
Suein10b | Report | 2 Aug 2006 20:36 |
|
As long as her father is named Yes |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 2 Aug 2006 20:37 |
|
Yes she will marry in her first married name & her maiden name will also be shown. Doesnt work tho for further marriages |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jean Durant | Report | 2 Aug 2006 20:37 |
|
If her father is named on the certificate.... yes. Jean :))) |
|||
|
Angela now in Wilts (not North Devon) | Report | 2 Aug 2006 20:37 |
|
Not as such - but it should name her father with his surname, which amounts to the same thing. Angela |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 2 Aug 2006 20:39 |
|
My Gt Nans second marriage did . she was shown as Esther Batchelor formerly Emons. Emons was her maiden name.I have the cert |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 2 Aug 2006 20:45 |
|
Well well, I was going to say that is brilliant news................... but ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, the blinking marriage was in 1835!!! Aaaaaagh!!!!!!!! *Multiple offensive swearwords here*. Thanks anyway, back to the drawing board .....! Bev x |
|||
|
Jack | Report | 2 Aug 2006 21:31 |
|
I know you're talking about a case in the 1800s but the current situation is that you don't have to include your maiden name on your marriage cert/registration if you choose not to. However, if you ever need to prove that you were called something else (e.g. from a previous marriage), the onus is on you to do so. As for father's details, it's optional whether you include them. Btw, on a civil partnership certificate, you can opt to show any combination of father/step-father (must be married to your mother)/adoptive father/mother/stepmother (must be married to your father)/adoptive mother. All much more up-to-date!! Jack |
|||
|
Cornish | Report | 2 Aug 2006 23:17 |
|
Had a marriage certificate through yesterday of my gt etc grandmother, marriage was in 1884, and it gave her maiden name not her previous spouse's surname. So there's still hope Bex x |
|||