Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
GRO births,1844 Is this possible?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Gwyn in Kent | Report | 20 Jul 2006 10:15 |
Can you have 3 births with the same surname, 2 in September Q. and 1 in December Q. all with the same volume and page number?.... Or is there a mistake here?... Godstone R.D. |
|||
|
Right said Fred | Report | 20 Jul 2006 10:19 |
can you give some details so we can have a look please? |
|||
|
Gwyn in Kent | Report | 20 Jul 2006 10:31 |
Thank you for reading, Tom. The surname is BELLCHAMBERS, Betsy and Sampson in Sept. Q. 1844 Betty in Dec. Q, 1844 Thanks, Gwyn |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 20 Jul 2006 10:46 |
Yes, it's possible. The two in September qtr. could be twins (although not definitely as they could be cousins or not related at all). The one in the Dec. qtr. could be a cousin (or no relation at all, just the same surname but another family). They probably have the same page number as there probably weren't many births at that time. Kath. x |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 20 Jul 2006 10:55 |
I'm looking at the 'Complete Indexes' on Ancestry, which gives the full names. This is the address:- http://www.ancestry(.)co.uk/search/rectype/vital/freebmd/bmd.aspx remove brackets. It's the top section out of the three on the page. Kath. x |
|||
|
Gwyn in Kent | Report | 20 Jul 2006 11:00 |
Kath I did wonder about the possibility of just a few births there but as registration districts cover a large area, I thought there would have been more births per page in one quarter, so that a new page was needed for the next. I guess not all births were registered then though, so perhapss that's another reason. Thank you for your help. Gwyn |
|||
|
Gwyn in Kent | Report | 20 Jul 2006 11:04 |
Sorry John My reply to you seems to have disappeared. The entries are hand written on Ancestry, all with the same reference. Thank you for your interest. Gwyn |
|||
|
Gwyn in Kent | Report | 20 Jul 2006 11:29 |
Thank you all for your input. These are not my ancestors. I am helping with a one name study and the researcher thought she must have copied the index numbers incorrectly, so asked me to check them. I have just phoned Leatherhead, who hold records for Godstone and a lady there too says it's quite possible at that time to have same numbers, but they relate to the GRO books rather than local records. Gwyn |
|||
|
Kate | Report | 20 Jul 2006 11:44 |
Gwyneth, they started a new set of pages every quarter, reusing all the page numbers, if you see what I mean, so it is just a coincidence if births in different quarters have the same page number. Some districts were much bigger than others, by the way, so some would have a range of maybe 200 pages while others would only cover a couple of pages. The funny names on FreeBMD mean that the FreeBMD transcriber couldn't make out all the letters and inserted 'uncertain character' codes. Kate. |
|||
|
Gwyn in Kent | Report | 20 Jul 2006 14:46 |
Thanks Kate. |