False statements - naughty naughty! - Genealogy Chat - Boards

Genealogy Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: April 2004 Posts: 20,615 Send Message	Heather	Report	18 Jul 2006 20:08
	No, you dont need to provide proof. It really throws you when a woman registers a birth in her supposed married name and after months of searching you find her marriage 17 years after the child was born!
Member Since: January 0001 Posts: 0 Send Message	Unknown	Report	18 Jul 2006 19:10
Member Since: January 0001 Posts: 0 Send Message	I didn't have to prove I was married when I registered my son in 1992.
Member Since: January 2003 Posts: 49,504 Send Message	Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it	Report	18 Jul 2006 18:57
	Short answer None!!. My paternal gran had two children by her second husband & they were reg in his name with her maiden name as if they were married . BUT they didnt marry till 3 years after the first one was born
	Researching: Surname Fahse. Germany. Essex .South East London My avatar is one of our wedding photos of 1957
Member Since: August 2005 Posts: 78 Send Message	Mog	Report	18 Jul 2006 18:45
Member Since: August 2005 Posts: 78 Send Message	I have someone who married in 1904 and was a spinster. However, when she registered her daughter's birth in 1901, she was using the same name but claimed to be married and even gave a fictitious maiden name! What proof of marital status, if any, did people have to provide when registering a birth? Does anyone know? Mog