Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Help reading BIRTH index please
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mark | Report | 11 Jul 2006 13:03 |
|
December quarter 1856 Hannah Elizabeth Lenton - I think the reference is Foleshill 6a 347? But after last night's fiasco I want to double check Anybody make the numbers out better than I can? Mark |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 11 Jul 2006 13:12 |
|
Cant see Hannah Lenton in 1856 December quarter !!! |
|||
|
Mark | Report | 11 Jul 2006 13:18 |
|
I browsed the Birth index images for 1856 (actually looking for Ann Elizabeth Lenton! but think Hannah might be her.She's on Lenhan, Emma - Lenton, Mary Ann Mark |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 11 Jul 2006 13:20 |
|
Mark - can you check the year you are looking at please - are you sure it is 1856 |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 11 Jul 2006 13:23 |
|
Just noticed - your heading says marriage index - one of your postings says birth What are we looking for !!! You´re not making it easy for us!!!!! |
|||
|
Mark | Report | 11 Jul 2006 13:24 |
|
Jeanette, I can't find that one, but mine is definately in 1856 (I think!) Unless I'm going mad of course! I've just had another look at my image and it is certainly 6d which makes more sense, but still looks like 341 or 347 for the page. How did you find yours? Mark |
|||
|
Mark | Report | 11 Jul 2006 13:24 |
|
Whoops! I've changed the header - it is birth. Sorry everybody. It is high time I stopped and did some real work. You know - the kind that earns money to pay for all these certificates! Mark |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 11 Jul 2006 13:24 |
|
OK you are looking at births - not marriages !!!!! Image isn´t clear - have checke image on 1837 online - not clear either If you want to order the certificate then make a note on the checking reference that image is not clear and they will probably help you out and find the right one. |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 11 Jul 2006 13:26 |
|
Too late Mark - changing heading after we have been sitting here doing the searching. Tut, tut!!!! Back to work for you - and sorry I couldn´t reply to your comment last night about dressmakers - had gone to bed - but saw that Merry explained alternative occupation!!! |
|||
|
Jeanette | Report | 11 Jul 2006 13:28 |
|
I deleted mine as it was a death didn't realise until i posted it Oops Jeanette |
|||
|
Mark | Report | 11 Jul 2006 13:28 |
|
Thanks for looking everybody - I'm so sorry I put marriage. Comes of too much peering at grainy images on the computer. I'll not bother you all for a while :-( Mark |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 11 Jul 2006 13:31 |
|
Sorry should have said - but I thought image was 6d 342 !! |
|||
|
Jeanette | Report | 11 Jul 2006 13:34 |
|
i think its 6d 347 as other one from that area are 6d Jeanette |
|||
|
Mark | Report | 11 Jul 2006 13:48 |
|
I think you might be right about 342 Elaine - the 7s have a pronounced flourish elsewhere on the page. Once again: thanks for looking (Back to work properly now) Mark |
|||