Genealogy Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: June 2004 Posts: 3,470 Send Message	Phoenix	Report	6 Jul 2006 15:49
Member Since: June 2004 Posts: 3,470 Send Message	Post 1983 is the one bit that ought to be accurate, as the index (so I understand) is computer generated.
Member Since: February 2003 Posts: 26,345 Send Message	Gwyn in Kent	Report	6 Jul 2006 15:46
	I help a friend collect information for a one name study and she is really keen on accuracy...... For records after 1983 are we looking at indexed lists which may have been retyped a number of times.... or where do the lists come from.... Do they have transcribers like on freebmd?

All site material is owned by Findmypast Limited and should not be used without prior permission.

Any views expressed in message boards and members notes represent the opinions of the author and do not represent the opinions of Findmypast Limited.