Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Registrar at Chapel wedding..why please???
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Sheila | Report | 30 Jun 2006 13:29 |
My great grandparents married on 15th Feb. 1890 in the primative Methodist Chapel, Smith Street, Rochdale Lancs. Their certificate states 'By certificate' Minister Samuel Johnson Registrar Elias Taylor. out of interest I looked up their marriage on BMD Lancashire website, and it states, place of marriage Rochdale register office, or Registrar attended. please could someone explain why a registrar would have to attend a chapel marriage? Many thanks Sheila. |
|||
|
Judith | Report | 30 Jun 2006 13:32 |
At that time church of England ministers were legally able to register a marriage but most non conformist ministers were not so the registrar had to attend to make the marriage legal. |
|||
|
An Olde Crone | Report | 30 Jun 2006 13:34 |
Short answer is because at that time the only people able to perform legal marriages were Church of England vicars etc, or Registrars. It means that no-one at the Chapel had the legal right to perform a recognisable marriage, so the Registrar attended to make it legal. Roman Catholics, Quakers and Jews were exceptions to this rule and marriages performed by their clergy(? right word?) were recognised as being legal. OC |
|||
|
Sheila | Report | 30 Jun 2006 13:34 |
Thankyou Judith. OC. Simple when you know. kind regards Sheila xxxxx |
|||
|
fraserbooks | Report | 30 Jun 2006 13:38 |
Individual chapels had to be solemised which meant paying a fee to be licensed to preform weddings so a small chapel might not have bothered. |
|||
|
Sheila | Report | 30 Jun 2006 13:45 |
Thankyou Annie, All very interesting, and something that I thought would have changed long before 1890. Both parties were christened Church of England,and great grandfather married his first wife, who died young , in the anglican faith, so the fact they were married Methodist is interesting. Sheila. |
|||
|
Kris | Report | 30 Jun 2006 13:48 |
I recently attended a wedding in a Baptist church and there was a seperate registrar to the minister conducting the service. |
|||
|
Dizzy Lizzy 205090 | Report | 30 Jun 2006 13:58 |
I married in a Baptist Church in 1989 and a registrar needed to be present as our Minister was not a certified registrar. Liz |
|||
|
Christine in Herts | Report | 30 Jun 2006 14:10 |
A member of the Church of England clergy is automatically a Registrar - part of it being the Established Church. I believe that, although it is often the case that equivalent religious leaders in other denominations and other religions are Registrars, it is not actually automatic. Christine |
|||
|
Christine in Herts | Report | 30 Jun 2006 16:11 |
My brother did too, Gillian. The priest hadn't twigged that my father could have done the job for them! Christine |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 30 Jun 2006 16:15 |
This still went on in 1957!! we were married in a Catholic church but we had to be remarried in the vestry by a registrar cos it wasn't a legal marriage otherwise. we had to post banns not only in the church but at the local Town hall & book the registrar to attend the wedding to do the legal thing. |
|||
Researching: |