Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
VERY YOUNG SERVANT?!
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Janet in Yorkshire | Report | 7 Jun 2006 20:06 |
Education wasn't actually compulsary - parents needed a few extra coppers, so the children were put to useful occupation - i.e.employment. Jay |
|||
|
fraserbooks | Report | 7 Jun 2006 19:53 |
The factory acts were just that factory acts. They did not apply to farm work or domestic work. There were also acts for coalmines, shops and railway premises. |
|||
|
Mandy in Wiltshire | Report | 7 Jun 2006 19:21 |
That's brilliant, many thanks everyone for your replies. Looks like he just got in before they made the lower age limit 10. Thanks again, Mandy :) |
|||
|
Zoe | Report | 7 Jun 2006 19:18 |
wasnt until teh Factory Act of 1878 thatthey bought in specific age limits Ithink: Factory Act of 1878 This brought all the previous Acts together in one consolidation. Now the Factory Code applied to all trades. No child anywhere under the age of 10 was to be employed. Compulsory education for children up to 10 years old. 10-14 year olds could only be employed for half days. Women were to work no more than 56 hours per week For a breakdown by Act try here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factory_Act |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 7 Jun 2006 19:18 |
Possibly! Not sure about laws relating to child labour at that time. I know there were regulations about the number of hours a child could work in a factory, but a domestic servant may not have had such legal protection. nell |
|||
|
The Ego | Report | 7 Jun 2006 19:16 |
i had one aged 8 who was a niece of the head of house.at that sort of time |
|||
|
Mandy in Wiltshire | Report | 7 Jun 2006 19:13 |
I’ve just found an ancestor on the 1871 census, aged 9, with an occupation of servant. He’s not with the rest of the family, so it would tie in with him being a servant, but did they really have servants as young as 9, as recently as 1871? Thanks for any advice! Mandy :) |
|||
|
Mandy in Wiltshire | Report | 7 Jun 2006 19:12 |
. |