Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Blandford orphanage destroyed?
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Stuart | Report | 6 Jun 2006 14:47 |
|
Has anyone come across any firm info regarding the orphanage records being destroyed in a fire in Blandford in the 1700's (?) resulting in all the orphans being named 'Blandford' from that point on? |
|||
|
Snowdrops in Bloom | Report | 6 Jun 2006 14:51 |
|
Sorry Stuart Can't answer your specific question but I can give you a good website for Blandford and if you scroll half way down the page there is a contact for the on-line parish clerk who may be able to help you. http://www.dorset-opc*com/Blandford/BlandfordForum.htm Good luck Snowdrops |
|||
|
An Olde Crone | Report | 6 Jun 2006 14:59 |
|
Cant answer your specific question but it was common practice to give foundling/orphaned children the place name as a surname in those days - a sort of shorthand way of declaring that the Parish accepted responsibility for them. Er, what do you mean by an orphanage in 1700s? Do you perhaps mean the Workhouse? Olde Crone |
|||
|
Snowdrops in Bloom | Report | 6 Jun 2006 15:07 |
|
Stuart, Here's another website for you with specific reference to the Blandford Workhouse. Very comprehensive, but not seen anything (after a quick look only) referring to a fire. http://users.ox*ac*uk/~peter/workhouse/Blandford/Blandford.shtml There is an 'l' at the end of shtm - it now appears on the next line, obviously the line's not long enough to take it. Remember to replace the * with . (dots). Snowdrops |
|||