Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Serious Brain power needed, please help xx

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

*** Fuzzy

*** Fuzzy Report 6 Jun 2006 16:09

thanks for that Georgina, this marriage is sending me nuts, cant progress really without it, think I have emily baker at home, but do like having a marriage and birth cert, so that I can cross reference x

Georgina

Georgina Report 6 Jun 2006 14:47

This is the family in 1871.... Albert Boxall abt 1870 Lambeth, Surrey, England Son Emily Boxall abt 1839 Lambeth, Surrey, England Wife Lambeth London George Boxall abt 1838 Childenfold, Surrey, England Head Lambeth London George Boxall abt 1865 Lambeth, Surrey, England Son Lambeth London Henry Boxall abt 1863 Lambeth, Surrey, England Son Lambeth London Mary Ann Boxall abt 1867 Lambeth, Surrey, England Daughter Lambeth London Source information: RG10/657 Registration district: Lambeth Sub-registration district: Lambeth Church First ED, institution, or vessel: 2 Folio: 43 Page: 42 (click to see others on page) Household schedule number: 282 GSU Number: 818942 1881 census... Geo. BOXALL Head M Male 40 Chaldford, Surrey, England Genl Laborer Emily BOXALL Wife M Female 41 Lambeth, Surrey, England Henry BOXALL Son U Male 18 Lambeth, Surrey, England Turner (Telegraph Wks) George BOXALL Son U Male 15 Lambeth, Surrey, England Genl Laborer Mary Ann BOXALL Daur U Female 14 Lambeth, Surrey, England Scholar Albert BOXALL Son Male 12 Lambeth, Surrey, England Scholar Wm. BOXALL Son Male 6 Lambeth, Surrey, England Scholar Sarah BOXALL Daur Female 3 Battersea, Surrey, England Amelia BOXALL Daur Female 12 m Battersea, Surrey, England Source Information: Dwelling 35 Everett St Census Place Battersea, Surrey, England Family History Library Film 1341151 Public Records Office Reference RG11 Piece / Folio 0652 / 130 Page Number 6 I am just posting these for reference. Georgina.

*** Fuzzy

*** Fuzzy Report 6 Jun 2006 12:29

Tricia, am just nipping upstairs to wash bleach out of hair, wont be long!! x

*** Fuzzy

*** Fuzzy Report 6 Jun 2006 12:28

Very Kind of you Tricia thanks very much, he is George Boxall born 1839/40 in surrey, place of birth varies from census to census, but Chiddingfold and Chalford are two, Mary Ann baker was born in 1847 in lambeth, and keeping fingers crossed that they did indeed marry and I can stop looking for the elusive marriage

Tricia

Tricia Report 6 Jun 2006 12:24

Want to give some info :when and where they was born and I will see if I can find them. Tricia

*** Fuzzy

*** Fuzzy Report 6 Jun 2006 12:13

Oh Poo cant find him on the 1901, typical eh?!!! will keep plugging away, their seem to many coincidences, but am I clutching at straws !!

Tricia

Tricia Report 6 Jun 2006 12:11

ok good luck Tricia

*** Fuzzy

*** Fuzzy Report 6 Jun 2006 12:06

Didn't think of that Tricia, will look now, thanks x

Tricia

Tricia Report 6 Jun 2006 12:05

Hi have you checked the 1901 census to see if it the same man? Tricia

*** Fuzzy

*** Fuzzy Report 6 Jun 2006 12:01

Right this is the problem: I asked for help on this marriage yesterday: George Boxall to Emily Baker, first child born in 1863 in Lambeth No-one could find it (made me feel not quite so stupid!) Think this is my Emily at home (she was born in Lambeth in 1840, and the only one in that area I could find) Source RG9/354, Folio 151, Page 10, GSU 542621 Census 1851. As you can see she has a sister Mary Ann. Emily Baker and George Boxall called one of their daughters Mary Ann (co-incidence?) By the 1891 census George Boxall is a widower In 1900 I find a George Boxall marrying a Mary Ann Baker. Does he marry Emilys sister ??? Would like some input on this, if anyone thinks this could be feasible (my hunch says yes) I could send off for this marriage cert, which in effect would give me the same info as the marriage I cannot find. Obviously though I need to be sure, as don’t want to build a tree with wrong rellies!!!! Would be eternally grateful for some advice peeps xxx

*** Fuzzy

*** Fuzzy Report 6 Jun 2006 12:01

see below