Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Help with American search needed pretty please
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mog | Report | 1 Jun 2006 14:50 |
|
Unfortunately not. I suppose your best bet is to get the birth certificate for their daughter and then cross check the mother's maiden name on the marriage index. Good luck! Just realised that the marriage reference can't be the right one as they were already married in 1861. Doh!! |
|||
|
♫ D☺ver Sue | Report | 1 Jun 2006 14:32 |
|
A marriage in 1862 would I suppose be likely for a child born in 1864, I have Eliza's Mother as being born in 1819 from the census which would make her 15 years younger than William and 44/45 when Eliza was born. I suppose stranger things have happened. Does the Camberwell marriage give a name for the bride? |
|||
|
Mog | Report | 1 Jun 2006 11:32 |
|
Marriage June Quarter 1862 Honeybourne, William Leonard Camberwell 1d 703 Could he be your William? |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 1 Jun 2006 11:05 |
|
birth will give mother's maiden Name: Eliza Ann Honeyborn Year of Registration: 1864 Quarter of Registration: Jan-Feb-Mar District: Dover County: Kent Volume: 2a Page: 777 zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz A marriage at the right time SCRUB THAT |
|||
|
Sylvia | Report | 1 Jun 2006 10:18 |
|
This man seems a bit old to have a 7 year old daughter in 1871. He would have been 60 when she was born. Maybe she was a grandchild. Sylvia. |
|||
|
♫ D☺ver Sue | Report | 1 Jun 2006 07:24 |
|
Yes you're right , he does appear in 1861 I had missed that. Nothing before that appears to match though :-( Thanks for trying guys. |
|||
|
Georgia | Report | 31 May 2006 23:31 |
|
I put his name into my US Ancestry subscription, and nothing came up for him. But he's all over the UK collection. In 1861 he gives his place of birth as UK ,as in Unknown, I believe. |
|||
|
♫ D☺ver Sue | Report | 31 May 2006 23:14 |
|
I am looking for a William Honeybourn(e) born c1804 who is simply listed as place of birth United States. He was married to a Sarah, but unfortunately I don't have her maiden name. He first seems to appear on the UK census of 1871 with his wife and Daughter Eliza who was 7 years old at that time. His profession is given as 'Baker'. Any ideas on where I can find any further information on him would be greatly appreciated. |
|||