Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
The only true proof............
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Merry | Report | 26 May 2006 10:18 |
I have often seen threads on here where the poster is agonising over whether Fred Bloggs who married Mary Smith is the father of her child born six months before they married.......Yet had the baby been born 10 years after the marriage the poster would be quite happy to accept him as the father! But maybe he is the bio dad in the first case and the milkman is the bio dad in the second case!!! LOL My hubby has had a DNA test to prove his bio father is the man who brought him up (there is an imposter on hubby's birth cert!! LOL) I just wish hubby would hurry up and complete the job of getting this through the court and having a declaration made for the GRO so an amendment can be made to his birth cert. Merry |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 26 May 2006 09:03 |
I think you are probably right Heather. I think perhaps there is a lot to be said for the saying 'what you don't know, can't hurt you'. Kath. x |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 26 May 2006 08:56 |
Ah, but back then Kath, I think people were content to have food in their belly and a roof over their head and it probably never occurred to them to wonder about their genetic parentage. |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 26 May 2006 08:48 |
You're quite right Heather, but I still know of an awful lot of people who would give anything to know their true parentage, even though they have been brought up happily by wonderful 'parents' who weren't around at the conception. Kath. x |
|||
|
The Ego | Report | 26 May 2006 08:44 |
Fair comment.....! |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 26 May 2006 08:43 |
Absolutely true, but then is it that important? I tend to think that the people who formed our ancestry are the ones that we are connected to. A passing sailor in dockland may be the sire of your ancestor, but surely its the family who shaped his outlook and the stories he heard from them etc. that makes them 'our family'? |
|||
|
Angela | Report | 26 May 2006 08:41 |
Morning, Alter. How can any of us be sure of any baby's parentage unless we were present at the conception?!! I have quite a few that I am not sure whether one or either of the 'parents' actually were. I am certain that some of my ancestors stated that babies in their household were their own when they were actually the illegitimate babies of their unmarried daughters. |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 26 May 2006 06:55 |
no proof that the mother on the cert is the true mother either!! |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 25 May 2006 23:50 |
Of course, they are absolutely right. How many of us can be 100% certain that our father really IS our father. One of my mothers little sayings:- Mother's baby, father's 'maybe'!! Kath. x |
|||
|
The Ego | Report | 25 May 2006 23:45 |
The only reliable proven bloodline we can all follow is a pure female bloodline,ie your mothers ,mothers,mothers,mother etc.....never thought about it like that until reading tonight that thats what german genealogists take more seriously.....food for thought |