Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Any ideas on which William
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Elizabeth | Report | 18 May 2006 10:40 |
|
Please see below |
|||
|
Elizabeth | Report | 18 May 2006 10:41 |
|
I am looking for my great grandfather, William Ketley. I thought I had him, but am not so sure now. An old family member (since died) wrote his birth date and place and parent’s names. William Ketley born 1852 Good Easter,Essex son of James and Eliza. That all fits with BMDs. But he is missing on 1861 and 1871 census, anywhere. The rest of the family are all there. There is a death for a William Ketley in 1853. He came to Australia in 1874. Age on shipping record 20 years. Grandma said he was 16 when he came. I’ve found another William Ketley born 1857 Mashbury, Essex. Parents James and Eliza as well. This one is on 1861 and 1871 census then goes. And he would have been 17 when he came here. His shipping record gives age 20, born Essex, parents James and Eliza Ketley. Marriage in Australia in 1879 gives age 25 born Essex, parents James and Eliza. I can’t find another William Ketley with James and Eliza for parents in Essex. I’m beginning to think he is actually the 1857 one who put his age up to come here by himself. Any ideas?? |
|||
|
Jess Bow Bag | Report | 18 May 2006 10:43 |
|
maybe they had two, the first dying, and the the second being given the same name - it sounds macabre, but happened all the time |
|||
|
Elizabeth | Report | 18 May 2006 10:50 |
|
Sorry Jess I didn't make myself clear. This is two completely different families. Just had two James and Elizas marrying. One James and Eliza born 1818. Other James and Eliza born 1824 and 1830. I know about the name reuse. I have one lot who reused Isobell three times. Mind you, I have another lot who just had three Isobells and all lived. See what I have to put up with in my family. |
|||
|
Elizabeth | Report | 21 May 2006 22:55 |
|
Just nudging in hope someone has any ideas. Thanks. |
|||