Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Can someone have a look at this please
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Sue from Wakefield | Report | 2 Apr 2005 15:58 |
|
I forgot to check the image (doh!!) Thanks Sue xx |
|||
|
Sarah | Report | 2 Apr 2005 15:56 |
|
If everything else fits it's likely to be correct - I have a female listed as SON-in-law on one of my censuses, when she is actually the daughter, and her husband is son-in-law to the head. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Sue from Wakefield | Report | 2 Apr 2005 15:52 |
|
Harriet Kitson 65 Wakefield, Yorkshire, England Head Southill Yorkshire Alfred Kitson 28 Wakefield, Yorkshire, England Son Southill Yorkshire Eliza Kitson 25 Wakefield, Yorkshire, England Daughter Southill Yorkshire Phillip Kitson 25 Wakefield, Yorkshire, England Son Southill Yorkshire Anne Kitson 3 Wakefield, Yorkshire, England Daughter Southill Yorkshire Sarah A Kitson 2 months Ossett, Yorkshire, England Daughter Southill Yorkshire This is the 1871 census. Ps I have the marriage cert of Eliza and Philip |
|||
|
Sue from Wakefield | Report | 2 Apr 2005 15:51 |
|
I am trying to find Eliza Kitson (nee Batty) married to Philip Kitson..........on ancestry this is the only match I can find..........the reason I want a second opinion is that Eliza is registered as the daughter of the Head....when she should be registered as daughter in law.................what do you think??.........Sue xx |
|||