Can someone look at 1881 on ancestry 2nd opinion p

Genealogy Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: November 2003 Posts: 2,610 Send Message	Janet 693215	Report	9 Mar 2005 19:50
	If someone could have a peek at the following and tell me if I am being too hopeful. !881 census, London, Shoreditch District 20 page 13. Halfway down the page is an A E E L de ? In your wildest imagination could you see this as a mistranscription of Tocqueville?
Member Since: May 2003 Posts: 0 Send Message	Crista	Report	9 Mar 2005 20:48
Member Since: May 2003 Posts: 0 Send Message	Janet, Do the other details fit in with him being one of your relatives? Crista
Member Since: November 2003 Posts: 2,610 Send Message	Janet 693215	Report	9 Mar 2005 21:08
	Hi all, thanks for your opinions. The name is a definate mistranscription. ( Goodness me, an error, never!)The problem is, his name should be E A, he was French, his children were all born different addresses in the vacinity(within a couple of streets) and as for occupation well he was skin dyer/ tavern cook/ chef. I don't know if he was even in England at the time. I was trawling the area looking for his 'wife' whose probably there but mistranscribed. I think I'll keep him in mind for future reference. Forgot to say he appears on 1891 as Longueville and he dies in 1892.