Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Has the Family Relatives site ironed out it's prob
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown | Report | 1 Mar 2005 10:45 |
|
I've been one of the lucky ones who never had any problems with it from the start. As Heather and Steve have said I much prefer it to 1837 as the search system gives you so much more for your money. Once the earlier section has been trasncribed it will be even better Lou |
|||
|
♥♪ˇ Karen | Report | 1 Mar 2005 10:08 |
|
I might be brave & give it a go then |
|||
|
Steve | Report | 1 Mar 2005 10:06 |
|
i go with that. if they had the 1837-65 sorted i would use nothing else. so they're onto a winner here. |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 1 Mar 2005 10:04 |
|
Mine is working perfectly now but it did take about 20 email complaints to them. In all fairness they did give me a large number of credits for my inconvenience. If it had the 1837-66 transcribed I would use nothing else for look ups because you can do a whole blanket search of a name and just pay for the ones you want to view. So much easier than 1837. I actually printed out 9 pages of b,m,d of one surname with refs all for 18 credits - how much would that lot have cost on 1837? Well, I couldnt have done it on 1837 cos they require a year and quarter. On familyrellies I just entered the surname and all years from 1866-1920 for London. |
|||
|
Steve | Report | 1 Mar 2005 09:37 |
|
they have seemed to have sorted it. anyway i would keep with this site as what else do we have? 1837? compared to that its real good Steve |
|||
|
Angela | Report | 1 Mar 2005 09:35 |
|
I have given up on it. Pity because it was quite useful. I couldn't understand their replies to my queries about the site timing out. I don't think that I am particularly thick (although I could be suffering from delusions there!) but it would have taken a software engineer to sort it all out. If the site is going to cause me so much agro then I can't be bothered with it. |
|||
|
♥♪ˇ Karen | Report | 1 Mar 2005 09:15 |
|
Not sure whether to buy any credits or not. |
|||