Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Help re birth registration

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

sarahjw03

sarahjw03 Report 27 Feb 2005 00:11

Thanks Nell, I never thought of that. He didn't get married until 1901 though (unless he had a first wife, which I can't find!) Sarah

Unknown

Unknown Report 27 Feb 2005 00:04

From the brilliant http://home*.*clara*.*net/dixons/Certificates/indexbd*.*htm [remove * to use] 'Column 8 - Date of Registration. In the early days the parents had 3 weeks to register in and could not register at all after 3 months. After a while this was changed to 6 weeks to register in, a late registration could be made up to a year after the birth if the superintendent took the information and signed the register too, and registration could not take place after 1 year without reference to GRO. Once the delay was this long then proof of the event had to be provided by other parties who knew of this event eg midwife or doctor or siblings alive at the time and able to recall the event. Even now, if it is not possible to provide the proof and/or the people who can attest to the truth of the event it is not possible to register and there are people walking around today with no birth certificate. It means, therefore, that a birth registered very late could be in the indexes a whole year later or more than expected. It is also relevant in that there were penalties for late registrations that were quite severe in the beginning and rather than get into trouble parents would 'adjust' the date of birth to fall within the specified time for registration. If you have a discrepancy between a date of birth on a certificate and one given on a baptismal certificate, have a look at the date of registration. If it is very close to the six weeks, it is quite likely that the parents didn't tell the truth at registration but did at baptism where there were no penalties. There were no checks on the dates of birth until well into this century.' The birth may not have been registered for many reasons, including just forgetting about it. But perhaps the child's age of 15 was significant - maybe s/he started work/wanted to get married which is when the fact s/he wasn't registered came to light? nell

Unknown

Unknown Report 26 Feb 2005 23:59

Sarah Hold on, I might have the answer in a minute. nell

sarahjw03

sarahjw03 Report 26 Feb 2005 23:58

Does anyone know why a birth in 1873 might not have been registered until 1888? This has happened in the case of one of my ancestors. The certificate has the correct birth date on, but it wasn't registered until 15 years late! Sarah