Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

census- marked unknown

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Joan

Joan Report 3 Feb 2005 10:05

hi, Many thanks to Jonathon for telling us ancestry now had Yorkshire, i now have my OZYER records confirming bits i already knew. BUT when i looked up my OZYER family why does it say next to their name (on Ancestry) UNKNOWN. Help please . What was unknown? Thanks, Joan

KathleenBell

KathleenBell Report 3 Feb 2005 10:38

This is something I'd like to know too, Joan. I've seen it a few times on Ancestry, and can't make out what it means. Kath. x

Joan

Joan Report 3 Feb 2005 11:28

hi, Jim in Soton, Do i take this to mean that the enumerator(?) had simply never heard of the name, What index is it not in? Ozyers have been on most census returns upto then but not in Leeds area. Thanks Joan

Unknown

Unknown Report 3 Feb 2005 11:45

I've had this several times with mine and the explanation I was given is that the Unknown means that the enumerator didn't know whether that was how the name was spelt or whether the name had been understand and written down correctly Lou

Jools

Jools Report 3 Feb 2005 13:00

I think you will find the large number of Unknowns is Ancestry's invention. If the surname doesn't match with surnames they have in their database, Ancestry seem to mark it as unknown - it's absolutely nothing to do with what's on the image or what the enumerator wrote 9 times out of 10.

Geoff

Geoff Report 3 Feb 2005 13:09

I think it is just an error by the indexer. Presumably when indexing they enter stuff into a spreadsheet/database with spaces for: First name Middle name Last name Age Married state etc With the name John Smith, if John is entered in the "First name" box, Smith into "Middle name" box and nothing in the "Surname" box it just appears as "Unknown" as a surname. It obviously has nothing whatsoever to do with what is shown on the census sheet which represents the only "truth" that can be gleaned. It's just something thrown up by the indexing system and human error. If it doesn't say "unknown" on the census page, it can only have appeared during indexing.

Catherine

Catherine Report 3 Feb 2005 13:22

Hi, I also have 'unknown' next some family members. Their family name was BAUERKELLER, I assumed 'unknown' meant that the enumerator was unsure whether the name was right as it was unusual!?! Cate :)

Thelma

Thelma Report 3 Feb 2005 15:36

Well Joan I said it was an interesting question. How can i ever thank you. I have just found 6 names in 1871 that i would never have found without UNKNOWN. I entered unknown bristol,then waded through until i reached the w's,about 3 pages and there they were!!!!!

Patricia

Patricia Report 3 Feb 2005 17:10

The following is actually transcribed on the census: John (n k jone & no meani of known) (Unknown) If you look at the original page it says: John (N K gone & no means of knowing) Now we know whay we have to search so hard!!

Louise2212

Louise2212 Report 3 Feb 2005 17:24

my tyrer's are down as Tuyprer(Unknown) but if you look at the census it's written as Tyrer - but could look like a Tuprer