Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1901 census Ancestry shocker
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Theresa | Report | 23 Jan 2005 02:10 |
|
I have just come across a shocker whilst looking for my Kilminster rellies on the index, an 81 year old infant living with his parents aged 39 and 36 his estimated birth year was 1820!!!! on looking at the original he was "under month" old, the place of birth was wrong as well for the father they had Swerton, when the original said Tiverton. Has anybody else got other ones like this. Theresa |
|||
|
Louise2212 | Report | 23 Jan 2005 09:51 |
|
occasional you'll find a 122, 222 or evn 322 year old but if you look at the image thy're only 22 |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 23 Jan 2005 09:59 |
|
I had an 82 year old Nurse Child living with one of my families. On the image he was actually 2! Lou |
|||