Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

another puzzle!

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Clare

Clare Report 1 Dec 2004 15:26

George carter born 1842 in march cambridgeshire trying to find his wifes maiden name ..mary jane they had moved to crawshawbooth before the 1871 census and this says mary j was born in haslingden They had a few children the oldest being isiah born in 1866. I am trying to find the marriage record so i can figure out mary j's maiden name.. but htis is all bmd came up with Carter George Whittlesey 3b 1335 CRANE James E Whittlesey 3b 1335 FERVEGUE Elizabeth Whittlesey 3b 1335 Whyle Mary J Whittlesea 3b 1335 Whyte Mary J Whittlesey 3b 1335 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Now whittlesey could be right as its cambridgeshire i believe but why would there be 5 people?? Could they be unsure of her surname?? I have done a search for haslingden and no mary j whyte/whyle was born there in 1846 so am i looking in the wrong place?? Am i going mad?? Help !! If this is the right marriage then they were cutting it fine before isiah was born lo xx clare

Sandra

Sandra Report 1 Dec 2004 15:29

One of the children's birth cert would give her maiden name.Sandra

Patricia

Patricia Report 1 Dec 2004 15:30

Hi clare The best thing to do would be to get a birth certificate of one of the children - this would show you the maiden name and make searching for the marriage a bit easier. Trish

Clare

Clare Report 1 Dec 2004 15:34

thanks i will have to get it ordered but was hoping to find it online but i guess i will have to go the long way round. Thanks xx

Christine in Herts

Christine in Herts Report 1 Dec 2004 17:48

Hello I would expect that the page has been transcribed twice (they'd do that to act as a double-check) and her line has been interpreted slightly differently each time. I was trying to have a look at the free images, myself, but keep getting zero K files - i.e. nothing to read. But if you can (eventually) look at the image for yourself, perhaps you'll be able to make your own mind up about her name. http://images.freebmd.org.uk/cgi/choose.pl Christine

McDitzy

McDitzy Report 1 Dec 2004 17:57

I looked on 1837 for you, the marriage seems to be registered under the two names there, WHYLE and WHYTE. I found this on FreeBMD. Maybe it was WHYLE. But again to be safe you need to buy a birth certificate of the children, this woman was born in Cambridgeshire, not Lancashire. Surname First name(s) District Vol Page ------------------------------------ Births Jun 1845 -------------------------------------- WHYLE Mary Jane Whittlesey 14 145

Clare

Clare Report 1 Dec 2004 18:07

thats what i thought too, if it is the same person why would she put cambridgeshire as place of birth but on the census it is haslingden?? I will have to apply for a copy of the certificates to be sure. xx thanks xx clare

An Olde Crone

An Olde Crone Report 1 Dec 2004 18:41

Clare Have you looked on Lancsbmd for this marriage? Although not all marriages are transcribed yet, if they ARE then you get one groom to one bride and a handy reference number for the local Registry Office, which in my experience is the best place to get certs from - really fast, a matter of days rather than weeks. Good luck Marjorie.

AnninGlos

AnninGlos Report 1 Dec 2004 21:36

Quite frequently they would put the wrong place of birth on censuses Ann Glos