Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

worker in tin/brazier - a puzzle

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Judith

Judith Report 31 Jul 2004 22:12

Thanks Geoff, You know the difference, now I know the difference, I'm just hoping that the vicar who wrote out the marriage certificate might not have known the difference :-)

Geoff

Geoff Report 31 Jul 2004 21:37

A detail difference in what Gary said I'm afraid Brazier is a worker in brass; Brazer is someone who joins things together using brass (or similar metal) to join them.

Judith

Judith Report 31 Jul 2004 20:54

Thanks Gary, I'm getting a very good feeling about all this now.

Gary

Gary Report 31 Jul 2004 20:51

A brazier would work with tin or steel as brazing is a way of welding metals together,using brass as a form of hot glue, not normally joining brass to brass.

Judith

Judith Report 31 Jul 2004 20:09

Oops Helen, you didn't read it wrong, I wrote it wrong - nephew George was 85 in 1915. I'll amend my original message:-) I think I'll still have to look for his birth to see if details of his dad match but of course it will have to be in parish records as its pre 1837. I don't think mum was Sarah as he was born about 9 years before her mariage. Hope you're right about the occupation. I had to look brazier up to see what it meant so I suppose they could have been confused about its meaning too.

Unknown

Unknown Report 31 Jul 2004 19:58

Judith Correct me if I read this wrongly, but you are saying Sarah had Charlotte in 1840 and George jnr would be born 1840 if he is to be 75 in 1915? Have you got their birth refs - the only way to prove the relationship is to see George Judkins' birth cert with Sarah formerly Manley as his mother. I don't know how specialised metal workers were, maybe the registrar was confused and thought brazier was any metal-worker. Helen

Judith

Judith Report 31 Jul 2004 19:43

My Gt Gt Grandfather John Manley was born in St Lukes Middlesex in 1820, son of George and Charlotte Manley. He had a sister Sarah born 1813. George’s occupation is given as worker in tin on their baptism records and on John’s marriage certificate. I have a photo of John with his nephew George Judkins taken in 1915 when they were 95 and 85 respectively but have never known how the nephew fits into the family. I am now in contact with someone who has found a marriage between Sarah Manley (spinster, father’s name George Manley) and George Judkins, widower, in Hackney in 1839 and birth of their daughter Charlotte in 1840. I hope all this means that nephew George was the son of George Judkins senior’s first marriage and that this Sarah is my Gt Gt Grandfather’s sister BUT….. On Sarah’s marriage certificate her father’s occupation is brazier. Could a tin worker also work with brass. Or could Sarah have just got confused, knew dad worked with some sort of metal, or is this all just a huge coincidence????? Judith

Judith

Judith Report 31 Jul 2004 19:42

Any ideas on this one?