Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

changing first names

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Steph

Steph Report 26 May 2004 12:51

I have been looking for the birth of a Fanny Ayers in Peterborough in 1824, who's father was called Thomas. Today found a birth at the records office for a Mary Ayers in 1824 with father Thomas, mother Mary. Is it possible that she changed her name to Fanny from Mary? Her name is noted as Fanny when she marries and on her childs birth cert??? Anyone know?? Thanks, Steph

Devon Dweller

Devon Dweller Report 26 May 2004 13:10

Ive found this happen a few times in my tree. They seem to adopt what they were known as and not what they were born as. Just a little extra to keep us on our toes! Sheila

Steph

Steph Report 26 May 2004 13:14

thanks, Sheila! I really don't know what 'Fanny' would be used for, other than a shortened version of Frances!!

Ann

Ann Report 26 May 2004 13:57

i also seem to have this in my tree, I have a different birth name to the name on the marriage certificate. Does anyone know the legal position on this? Could you legally marry under a different name to the one you where registered under at birth? My relly was a humble miner and the first generation in his family that could even write, so I doubt he would have had the money or inclination to change his name legally. Also, as he married quite along way from his birth place- could he just have assumed that noone locally would know his real name anyway? Any thoughts???

Geoff

Geoff Report 26 May 2004 14:03

Quite often some of the children were not baptised - it's an unjustified assumption to think that one who WAS baptised changed their name (in the absence of other evidence).

Steph

Steph Report 26 May 2004 14:33

thanks, everyone! You are right Geoff, about making assumptions! I won't put in any info, until I am positive! Think I'll have to do more work! Steph :-)))

Unknown

Unknown Report 26 May 2004 15:16

I believe that there are two ways you can change your name 1. by deed poll, involving solicitors and expense 2. by announcing that from now on you prefer to be called Tallulah (or whatever). As long as you use this name consistently I don't think there is any problem. It is possible Mary changed her name to Fanny or that her parents did so on her behalf. or perhaps she was Mary Frances and preferred her 2nd name? Or she was called Mary after her mother and then known as Fanny to differentiate her from her mum? I have instances in my family of people using their 2nd name in preference to their first, or alternating them depending on how they (or an official form-filler) felt about it at the time. Maddening, but there we are!

Steph

Steph Report 26 May 2004 22:11

thanks, Helen. I had it in my head that perhaps her parents called her Fanny, to differentiate from her mother. And by the way, I think I'd now like to be called Tallulah!!! ;-)))