Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Registering births 1860s

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

BobClayton

BobClayton Report 6 Mar 2004 22:04

My wife was pregnant when we married and so was my mother when she married, it's nothing new. Bob

Shelli4

Shelli4 Report 6 Mar 2004 21:44

i have heard that some men wouldn't marry unless she was pregnant, and capable of providing a heir!!!!

Judith

Judith Report 6 Mar 2004 21:34

No I don't think the mother had to show proof of marriage and lucky you Kevin if your gt grandparents'marriage only occured a few months after conception. My gt gt grandparents registered births of 9 children from 1842 to 1860, with mother's name given as Margaret Ann Manley, formerly Cliffe, they also show on '51, '61 and'71 census returns as husband and wife so as you can imagine it took a while to find their marriage in 1880 38 years after the birth of their first child. Oh how I wish I could go back and ask them why! Judith

Kevin

Kevin Report 5 Mar 2004 17:20

I couldn't find my great grandparents marriage even though on my grandfathers birth certificate it said norton formerly hutton. it wasnt' until someone else mentioned that they may have not been married at the time of conception. it turned out that they married a month before the birth (the devils ;-) ) Just because sex before marriage was frowned upon doesnt mean it didnt happen.

Shelli

Shelli Report 5 Mar 2004 17:12

Thanks. I have the father's name on the birth certificate (Thomas Blenkiron), then under her name it says Emma Blenkiron (formerly Woolley), but so far I have been unable to unearth a marriage ref for them. I've just received a death cert for a Thomas Blenkiron which I think is the correct one, in the hope that Emma might have registered the death, but no, it's thrown up another child!!!!!! Oh well, it's fun, although very addictive, searching.

Elizabeth

Elizabeth Report 5 Mar 2004 15:44

I don't know whether this helps you, it's more to do with illegitimate children, but before 1875 a mother registering a birth was able to give the fathers name even if they weren't married. After 1875 the father had to agree for his name to go on the certificate.

Shelli

Shelli Report 5 Mar 2004 14:58

Hello, I'm fairly new to this but thanks to the internet have made faster progress than I ever imagined. However, and this is probably a typical newbie question, does anyone know whether a mother had to provide proof that she was married when registering a childs birth in the 1860s? Many thanks Michelle