Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

how did it work!!!

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Dawn

Dawn Report 6 Sep 2003 08:01

but in the 1920s could they get away with not showing proof of who they were on a marriage certificate

Keith

Keith Report 5 Sep 2003 21:23

Hi Dawn. My understanding is that registration of a birth was compulsory. Naming of the father was however optional.

Shelli4

Shelli4 Report 5 Sep 2003 20:35

In addition, to Amanda's comment my 3 boys were registered when born. In my maiden name and no father on cert. Twins in 95 and Ben in 98. But when we married in 2002 we re-registered all three births again to legitmise their births(registar's words not mine!!)This time they're registered in married name with both parents present and correct. So their births appear twice tho the first entry should crossrefer the searcher to the second so I'm reliably informed. I know this won't help Dawn but thought I'd add my tuppence worth Shelli

David

David Report 5 Sep 2003 20:19

I sent off for the marriage certificate of a William Habberfield, thinking that between his age and fathers name I could place him in my tree. When it came back the age said Full, the father's name looks something like John Straw, its pretty unreadable but no where near long enough to be a Habberfield.

Melba64

Melba64 Report 5 Sep 2003 14:02

I have a situation similar to Nina's. My gr grandfather was illegitimate; his mother married about 18 months after his birth. On my gr grandfather's marriage certificate his father is down with the Forename of his mother's husband and mother's maiden name. I have sent for the birth certificate but don't expect a father to be on it as there was none on the birth record that I found on the LDS site. Melanie

Maz (the Royal One) in the East End 9256

Maz (the Royal One) in the East End 9256 Report 5 Sep 2003 09:47

Silly question but have you looked under the mothers maiden name? Also may be different area to which you are expecting. Could be not registered at all though, despite threat of fines etc. Depending on date, sometimes there are court records if father was sued for maintenance. They are called Bastardy Orders I think and should be in the local Record Office. My grandmother was born just after parents wedding, we think, but there is no record of her birth anywhere. As it was in the East End and there were so many churches, it will be a long search for a baptism. Even that probably won't confirm fathers name. Do know though that parents were courting for long time, so can be fairly certain. Maz. XX

Margaret

Margaret Report 5 Sep 2003 09:35

My husband's great grandfather died in York Workhouse, his death is in the workhouse records, but we cannot get a death certificate. It appears his death was not regestered. I asked "the Expert" Anthony on Tuesday and he said it was probably a clerical error by the workhouse and he was missed somehow. Perhaps the same happed to your relation. Margaret

Dawn

Dawn Report 5 Sep 2003 08:10

if a child at the turn of the century was born illegitamate how did it work. did they have tobe registered? did the father have to be named? my nan was illegitamate and her fathers name is on her marriage cert. but we cant find a birth certificate for her. if she knew who her father was would there be some sort of record for him being so and where is it?