Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

1891 census lookup for Warwickshire, please.

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Karen

Karen Report 2 Aug 2003 16:19

Hi there, Even though i know a lot of the Warwickshire census is online, i have not been able to find the family i want. If someone has acces to this census can they please try and find: Walter Parr born c 1854 Bristol Elizabeth Parr c 1847 Salford, Lancs Bruce Frederick Parr born 1881 Aston, Warwickshire. In 1881, Walter and Elizabeth lived at 60, Bracebridge Street, Aston, Warwickshire but have not found them on 1901 census, Thanks, Karen

Zoe

Zoe Report 2 Aug 2003 17:18

Karen, could this be them?? Parr, Walter   Head County: Staffordshire Age: 36 Civil Parish: Harborne Where Born: Gloucestershire, Bristol Eccl. Parish: The Old Chapel Town: Smethwick Parr, Elizabeth   Wife Age: 36 Where Born: Lancashire, Manchester Parr, Bruce  Son Age: 9 Born: Warwickshire, Birmingham Parr, May   Daughter Age: 5 Civil Parish: Harborne Gender: Female Born: Warwickshire, Birmingham just downloading image now to see if I can read the address zoe

Zoe

Zoe Report 2 Aug 2003 17:23

address looks like 9 Cedar Grove Terr, Cape Hill Con.

cambridgelass

cambridgelass Report 2 Aug 2003 17:25

Address for your Walter Parr is 9 Cedar Grove Terrace, Cape Hill, Con. RG12/2362 folio 48 pg 97

Karen

Karen Report 2 Aug 2003 19:44

Oh my goodness....I think you've found them. Mind you , Elizabeth lied about her age...in a big way. She was supposed to have been born in 1847 according to 1881 census but Walter and Bruce are right and i didn' know there was another child. Excellent. Walter has been causing me a lot of problems in the last few months and i 'm glad to finally have something on him. Again- thank you sooooooo much, Karen