Genealogy Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: February 2003 Posts: 0 Send Message	JillGr	Report	2 Apr 2003 00:37
Member Since: February 2003 Posts: 0 Send Message	Re 1837. I have just used 82 units to find one marriage. 22 of those were wasted because the pages were mis-labelled. I reported each one as I went along and also e-mailed them to point out what is an obvious problem. I'm hoping that they re-imburse me. It's bad enough trying to guess which page to look at without having to guess whether their labels are correct!

All site material is owned by Findmypast Limited and should not be used without prior permission.

Any views expressed in message boards and members notes represent the opinions of the author and do not represent the opinions of Findmypast Limited.