Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

how to work TryingToFind surname posts now

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

JaneyCanuck

JaneyCanuck Report 5 Oct 2007 22:02

John -- it worked! Thanks very much, and now I know for future ref.

JaneyCanuck

JaneyCanuck Report 5 Oct 2007 21:05

I doubt that GR is that, er, clever ;)

... but I'll tell ya, it sure does make googling for names virtually impossible! They were Cheshire, they lived in Cheshire ...

Not as bad as the Coke family members I'm desperate to find, though. The one who concerns me (husband of the sister of the wife of the Cheshire -- it's the two women who are in my family) changed his and his kids' name to McCock. Try googling that without the decency filter on. Don't bother googling it *with* the decency filter, of course ...



JaneyCanuck

JaneyCanuck Report 5 Oct 2007 18:50

Aha Jim -- that seems like a plan! When I do that and click on "add post", "Cheshire" is already entered in the "trying to find surname" line, so that may indeed be the trick.

When I get a bit of this work done I'll get on it. Thanks!

Thelma

Thelma Report 5 Oct 2007 18:47

I think that you should go through "surname summary" You will need the name in your tree.

JaneyCanuck

JaneyCanuck Report 5 Oct 2007 18:23

Heh, that's what I did the *first* time -- you're seeing the edited version. ;)

I've tried several different versions -- I think I'll try just no title + surname=Cheshire.

If that works, I'll delete the other; if not, I'll delete one randomly. ;)

Gwyn in Kent

Gwyn in Kent Report 5 Oct 2007 18:10

I just had a look....I see what you mean.


I think I would cut and paste a new posting and leave out the Trying to find ...and just put John's name...or even just CHESHIRE as the title.


Gwyn

JaneyCanuck

JaneyCanuck Report 5 Oct 2007 17:55

I've just put a big trying-to-find post in that forum, relating to someone with the surname Cheshire (with a reply, continuing the original post).

This was my first new-thread post in this category since the reorg -- in fact I'd only ever posted a new thread in it once before (back before replies in a thead were possible, so my continuation became a second "thread" that time.)

I'd like it to show up when someone searches the Trying To Find forum with the surname filter "Cheshire" on. That isn't happening.

I originally had given the post a title:

"JohnRogersCheshire/MaryEmmaHill 1860s-descendants"

with the surname Cheshire in the surname line.

I tried editing the title to the simple "Trying to find" with "Cheshire" in the surname line. No luck.

Does editing not work, so might I have to post it all over again, maybe, with the title "Trying to find" and "Cheshire" in the surname line?

The surname-filter function seems still to be working, for new posts, even where the title is something other than "Trying to find". A post was added to Trying To Find today, headed

"My Uncle Brian Wallace 1935 Sisters Mary Kate Ann"

When I add the surname filter "Wallace" and search the Trying To Find forum, that post turns up at the top (along with 2 other posts by the same person about the same thing in the last 4 days ...)

So why doesn't mine turn up at the top if I add the surname filter "Cheshire"??

Would starting over, with the subject Trying to find and the surname Cheshire, work?