Birth registers and certificates

Genealogy Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: May 2005 Posts: 0 Send Message	Linda	Report	24 Nov 2007 12:02
Member Since: May 2005 Posts: 0 Send Message	Thanks Gwyneth - these were the possibilities that I had thought of but just wanted to check that it did not necessarily mean that the child died. Thanks again.
Member Since: February 2003 Posts: 26,205 Send Message	Gwyn in Kent	Report	24 Nov 2007 11:58
	Sometimes...but not always a sickly child who did not survive was registered that way. Have you looked for a matching death around that time. Sometimes the child was un-named and given for adoption and sometimes the parents simply hadn't yet decided on a forename but registered the birth anyway. Parents' names would be shown in the usual way, even if the child is just shown as female ...or male. Gwyn
Member Since: May 2005 Posts: 0 Send Message	Linda	Report	24 Nov 2007 11:54
Member Since: May 2005 Posts: 0 Send Message	Hi - I am looking for some information on birth registers and certificates and the details they should contain. I have found an entry for a birth in 1933 that only says (Female) where there should be forenames. Can anyone explain under which circumstances these names would be missing? Thanks