Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Ian
|
Report
|
13 Jan 2010 06:15 |
After looking further, there was another mention in the gazette (thanks, Sue) four months previously, with the application for leniency (they called it a prayer) - and the same name- but he was the engineer. Very interesting- they must have fallen on very hard times.
Then he's really well-thought of after his drowning, (reading some other articles there about it)so they must have made good first.
I did end up working out how to find patents listed, via the gazette- and found a few over 1858-62- giving his address as Newcastle, and Bombay or both, at varying times in that period
Thanks again for the impetus & thoughts- I really appreciate it..
|
|
Susan10146857
|
Report
|
12 Jan 2010 14:51 |
The 'unemployed' one was in the gazette.
The one who drowned was an engineer
I suppose it means they didn't live 'within the fort'...sorry...sounds flippant I know. The fort would probably be protection ( military maybe) with gates that could close against any foe. Only by finding out more about the place would we understand exactly how the fort was situated and whether it was just an old saying or for military purposes.
|
|
Ian
|
Report
|
12 Jan 2010 14:21 |
Susan- another query...re that Gazette link- I feel sure that DTS was David Henry the son born in 1849. It says he was unemployed at the time. HIs father DTS the inventor would not have been in the same boat! I had a letter from DH's widow wherein she says he was a bit of a loafer before they married in 1882, so that fits in, somewhat.
But what might the phrase "without the fort" mean- it is attached to every name- unless it's a funny was of saying they are not imprisoned...?
Thanks.
|
|
Ian
|
Report
|
12 Jan 2010 11:10 |
Hi Susan, thanks for the thought, but that David Turnbull was a famous anti-slavery campaigner. At one time he was, I think a British consul to Cuba, but he was expelled because he kept criticizing the Cuban gov't's stance on looking the other way & allowing slavery. They would have or did imprison him while he was there, because he would not shut up! He wrote a book on his travels in Cuba etc and the treatment of slaves when they were supposed to have been liberated, published in around 1845- I have a 1960s reprint of it
He's a namesake, but the wrong age to be any of our DT's.
An interesting red herring all the same-thanks!
|
|
Susan10146857
|
Report
|
11 Jan 2010 23:23 |
This may have some relevance......
National Archives
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/search
Colonial Office and Predecessors: West Indies Original Correspondence CO 31... Correspondence from Dr R R Madden, Mr D R Clarke, Mr David Turnbull and the Foreign Office relating to the removal of 'liberated Africans' from Cuba. Richard Robert Madden was appointed superintendent of the liberated Africans and judge arbitrator in the Date: 1840. Source: The Catalogue of The National Archives
|
|
Ian
|
Report
|
11 Jan 2010 22:54 |
Susan- thank you a million times, thank you!
I honestly always suspected his death was nearer to 1870 than to 1864 which this 1930s genealogist supposedly told my ggrandfather.
Marion- that is the family- the LDS website was good as far as that goes. What was interesting there is the second names. I have copies of the Old Parish Registers which says all you mention, and names the relative after whom each one's first name was named, in some cases. The second names were dropped, or never used again in later life though (Helen Pullar & John Sturrock, except for Janet Stewart...) I find that intriguing. Whether or not Pullars & Sturrocks were relatives I have yet to ascertain, though it is somewhat likely.
My comments re pregnancies was just a bit of brainstorming, not a certainty.
I'll have a look around the London Gazette, Indian Office- that is interesting- very much so... at least Turnbull Stewart wasn't a common pair of names. How did you find it- surely not via Mr Google? (But maybe last time I tried, it hadn't been indexed as much...)
I can't think it would be his son, David Henry T S, the one born in 1849, who was my gg grandfather, though he was known to be nowhere nearly as motivated (well, slack bordering on lazy, actually) as his father (DT born 1826) the inventor & former boat owner. Maybe it is the younger one.
Another story we had was that DT, later DTS had a boat named Fanny, named after his wife Frances nee Middelton. It had been sold, and was lost, sunk in a collision with the Carnarvon or Caernaerfon or similar. I did have a photocopy of the clipping mentioning it, years ago, but lost it in a house fire. I'd love to refind that, and the date. I thought it was off the coast of Wales or Liverpool, circa 1860, but my memory's not good on that- I just remember finding it in a newspaper or shipping search I did in London in 1983 when I was over there. Anyhow, it was NOT insured, and was a total loss for the family, but DT/DTS survived, at least.
THANK YOU ALL, once again for the insights- I really appreciate it!
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
11 Jan 2010 20:10 |
well, Janey
unlike today, pregnancy was not an "illness", it was a perfectly natural event, and women were expected to maintain normal life as much as possible ....................... and if that meant taking a sailing ship to India or Australia, then so be it.
There'd be many women on board the ship to help out when the time came ........ and doctors weren't that much used anyway in deliveries.
BTW ..... I like your theory about the kids not being his, and the ethics of lying to the church vs the registrar
sylvia
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
11 Jan 2010 19:56 |
Susan# those are great!
Seems pretty definite David was alive and kicking after 1864 then. ;)
I'm liking the "they weren't his kids" theory more 'n more. And my embellishment: that the church would do anything, but registrars were a bit more hard-nosed.
And indeed, Sylvia, if women hadn't travelled when they were pregnant, women would never have gone nowhere. ;)
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
11 Jan 2010 19:47 |
Ian
I doubt very much whether there was any such dislike (or whatever you want to call it) re pregnant women travelling.
After all, women were chattels ........... they did and went where there menfolk went, when the menfolk wanted to go!
Just think of the numbers of children born at sea on the way to Australia, India or even America.
I would have also suspected that the way to get to India for most people, if not the majority of them, was to sail from London, Southampton or Portsmouth direct to Bombay. The opening of the Suez Canal would have reduced the time that the trip would take ........ previously they would have sailed around the Horn of Africa
I would never have previously even thought about your suggestion of crossing the English Channel, train down to the Mediterranean, ship across to Egypt, boat down the Suez Canal, etc etc. Far far too cumbersome a trip to take with all your goods and chattels, wife and children ...... and probably very much more expensive!
After all ............. the word "posh" comes from Port Out, Starboard Home. Meaning the preferred side of the ship to have your cabin for shade and a bit of relief from the sun as you travelled to and from India. The shipping line P&O developed its reputation sailing between England and India.
Nope ............ I think your family sailed from London to India, and didn't pay too much attention to whether the wife was pregnant or not.
If they left from Cuba or the West Indies, they might have been able to sail direct across the Atlantic, or gone up to New York and sailed to India from there.
it might be an interesting sideline to actually google and investigate sailing ships in the 1850s through to the 1880s to see where and how they sailed.
EDITED to correct information on "posh"
sylvia
|
|
Susan10146857
|
Report
|
11 Jan 2010 18:54 |
You may also be interested in the following about David Turnbull Stewart
http://www.london-gazette.co.uk/issues/23553/pages/5982
The Gazettes are searchable and free
|
|
Susan10146857
|
Report
|
11 Jan 2010 17:39 |
Hi Ian
LOSS OF A BOMBAY STEAMER AND FIFTY LIVES Glasgow Herald (Glasgow, Scotland), Monday, February 13, 1871; Issue 9709.
says a Mr David Turnbull Stewart was missing.....Have pm'd you
|
|
MarionfromScotland
|
Report
|
11 Jan 2010 16:32 |
IGI children of Isabella Stewart and David Turnbull
Results for: Father: David Turnbull, Mother: Isabella Stewart Exact Spelling: Off [refine search] [Print] Prepare selected records for download International Genealogical Index / British Isles - 8 Select records to download - (50 maximum) 1. JOHN STURROCK TURNBULL - International Genealogical Index Gender: Male Christening: 22 JAN 1832 Dundee, Angus, Scotland 2. DAVID TURNBULL - International Genealogical Index Gender: Male Christening: 20 JUL 1826 Dundee, Angus, Scotland 3. WILLIAM STEWART TURNBULL - International Genealogical Index Gender: Male Christening: 23 JAN 1825 Dundee, Angus, Scotland 4. JANET STEWART TURNBULL - International Genealogical Index Gender: Female Christening: 14 JUN 1829 Dundee, Angus, Scotland 5. HELEN PULLAR TURNBULL - International Genealogical Index Gender: Female Christening: 19 APR 1835 Dundee, Angus, Scotland 6. GEORGE TURNBULL - International Genealogical Index Gender: Male Christening: 11 MAR 1838 Dundee, Angus, Scotland 7. ISABEL TURNBULL - International Genealogical Index Gender: Female Christening: 07 MAY 1848 Saint Cuthberts, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland 8. Isabel TURNBULL - International Genealogical Index Gender: Female Christening: 07 MAY 1848 Saint Cuthberts, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
|
|
MarionfromScotland
|
Report
|
11 Jan 2010 16:29 |
I wonder if this is him..
IGI Individual Record FamilySearchâ„¢ International Genealogical Index v5.0 British Isles Search Results | Download | Print DAVID TURNBULL Pedigree Male Event(s): Birth: 12 JUL 1826 Christening: 20 JUL 1826 Dundee, Angus, Scotland Death: Burial: Parents: Father: DAVID TURNBULL Family Mother: ISABEL STEWART
|
|
Ian
|
Report
|
11 Jan 2010 16:02 |
Hi Rosemary- maybe you're right and they were born overseas...but they were still baptised within four weeks of birth, at Newcastle...so they can't have been too far offshore, I wouldn't have thought.
I don;t know how people in general, or close-knit families felt about pregnant & iminent mothers going on voyages, back in those days- I would have thought offhand, that they'd leave them land-based, if at all possible. Maybe our family just breaks all the rules though...
Susan! Thank you!!! Is the Newcastle Courant online now? That's the exact wording a genealogist found in the 1930s for my gg grandfather, of his gg grandmother's Isabella's death. I have her certificate here, and it also says Todds' Buildings, Jarrow. She was born in Alyth in 1801.
She's the first name on her son' David's family burial place, at Jesmond. It says "the Family Burial Place of David Turnbull Stewart, his beloved mother Isabella Stewart Turnbull...and then lists some children. It took me years to accept the juxtaposition of Stewart & Turnbull as not being an error. Scots women used to append their maiden name as a second name after they married, apparently, hence Isabella Stewart became Isabells Stewart Turnbull.
As for David, well whomever inscribed the tomb would have been given instructions from some relative to call him David Turnbull Stewart, which is how he fashioned himself in the 1860s in the baptism records of his latter three children.
Many thanks for your help folks!
|
|
Susan10146857
|
Report
|
11 Jan 2010 14:56 |
Not sure if this helps.....
Births, Deaths, Marriages and Obituaries
The Newcastle Courant etc (Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England), Friday, October 19, 1860; Issue 9695.
At Jarrow in Todd’s-buildings on the 12th inst., age 60, Isabella, wife of Mr. David Turnbull, Shipwright
|
|
Rosemary48
|
Report
|
11 Jan 2010 13:31 |
Hi Ian, as Auntysherlock says, they may have been born overseas. Two of my three brothers were born abroad. One in South Africa in 1941 another in TransJordon in 1945. I can't find any registration for these two brothers. My third brother and myself were born back in England in 1947 and 1948 and we are both registered. Perhaps there is a different registration method for overseas births to British parents? Regards
|
|
Ian
|
Report
|
11 Jan 2010 13:30 |
Another interesting thing is re David Turnbull the shipwright & his wife Isabella Stewart. They did travel a bit:
Most of their children were born in Dundee: William 1825, died sometime, young; David 1826 (the fellow who married Frances Middelton), John (I lost track of after 1851) Janet abt 1829, I guess she died, or married young, but I lost track of her Helen, later known as Ellen, 1835, married Thomas Miller in Northumberland George born 1839 in Dundee.
In 1841, they're ALL in Nonthumberland for the census.
Then William, namesake of his 1925 deceased brother, was born in 1845ish in Edinburgh- I've forgotten the address, but he died there aged 17 months. the Isabel was born there in 1849, the same year David the oldest son was married in Northumberland. Then they were all at the same address in the 1851 census- in Edinburgh- except for David 1826 who was now married, and staying with his parents-in-law the Middletons at Shinrone. (It must be a census error- he's a son-in-law, not a son of Henry Middleton.)
IN 1861, the Turnbull lot- those who're still single- the youngest, George & Isabel, with their widowed father David 1904 the shipwright, , were living in Jarrow, Co Durham, near Newcastle & next door to daughter/sister Ellen Miller nee Turnbull.
Also interesting is David 1826 & Frances Middleton who both changed to become Stewarts by the 1861 census, had their oldest daughter Frances Ann, born in Cuba, West Indies 1853, listed as living with THEM, and she's ALSO listed as living with Frances' parents, Henry & Mary Ann Middleton that same night. Both censuses say she was born in Cuba. One I read somewhere (might have been 1881 after she married, ) said she was born in West Indies BS, which I worked out after many years of thinking that it was Barbados, simply meant "British Subject".
...................
So, I also wonder why David Turnbull, the shipwright, who died in 1864 of the DTs, turned to alcoholism, and why he was not buried with his wife & grandchidren. He was apparently buried alone in Jesmond. The grave was moved about 15 (?) years ago with a lot of others to make room for a freeway. I do not know the inscription. I do have his death certificace though.
His oldest son David the inventor etc changed his surname to Stewart circa 1858. HIs other children added Stewart as a second name circa 1858, but they remained surnamed Turnbulls.
The oldest son David, did keep Turnbull as a second name in many instances-at least in the baptism registries of his younger three children in 1860, 62 & 64.
HIs two oldest sons changed their surname to Middleton-Stewart. in the 1880s in India.
Frances Ann, the daughter born in Cuba, on her wedding cert in 1876 in UK, lists her name as Frances Ann Turnbull-Stewart, and one of the witnesses is her brother John (1855)- who signs as John William Turnbull-Stewart (also with a hyphen). So he's still sticking to Turnbull for a bit, before he became Middleton-Stewart 10 years later.
There are clearly two generations who've suddenly decided to adhere Stewart to their names somehow, following about 1858.
Hence my idea about the Jacobites, and them havinbg been Stewarts to start with, and changing, then changing back say 100 years later.
I 'm inclined to think that the Stewart from Isabella Stewart, their mother & grandmother, born in Alyth in 1801, is a bit of a red herring, or a confusing coincidence of name, rather than a reson for it.
I may be wrong though. I've traced many cousin lines to see if anyone could verify any of ther legends, and no one has been able to come up with anything like what I have unearthed., unfortunately. Supposedly a case of documents that would have explained all was stolen circa 1920 in UK, while the bulk of the eldest line of the family was overseas in India.
Other family legend is that we were Stewarts of Craigiehall, the oldest son being disinherited just before 1600 due to religious differences & an argument with his father who was a weird bloke.
I'm open to any suggestions- and I'm trying not to be biased by existing legends! I'm also trying to trek backwards from fact to fact.
If you trace the Stewarts of Craigiehall lineage down, well the cranky father destroyed evidence of his elder three son's existance, and they left & went to USA we believe- maybe that's where West Indian plantations & money were amassed? Anyhow you'll only find details of one son a certain year, who was a break from the oldest always having been a David- this one was the youngest, and was Archibald, from memory, but I digress, and didn't mean to bring that up, except for interests' sake, and a bit of an explanation of why I favoured the Jacobite story of the coming & going & retaking the name Stewart in such a biggish way.
Please don't be influenced by my biases! Alternative brainstorming ideas do achieve great laterally thought alternatives- and there may be something in one of those avenues.
Thanks again, Ian
|
|
Ian
|
Report
|
11 Jan 2010 12:49 |
HI Folks, thank you all for your replies. I'd checked the censuses (or is it censii?) and did have the information you've all so kindly restated. I left it off my original question so as to not 'clutter' it up, as I was querying ideas about why the last three weren't birth registered.
There are many questions in the family though!
I appreciate the ideas and thoughts. What makes it more interesting is that the two oldest sons- David Henry, and John William, born 1848 & 1855 as Turnbulls (and I have their certs), and listed as Stewarts in the 1861 census, actually changed their surnames again, at the time of their respective marriages circa 1881 & 1890 in India, and became Middleton-Stewart with a hyphen.
Definitely no loyalty to Turnbull. David Henry (the son) was born in August 1849, nine months and two weeks after his parents' wedding in November 1848, so I can't see infidelity there. Frances' father, Henry Middleton, was a railway station master all his working life. There was no reputed money to inherit there, yet the two oldest boys definitely wanted their mother's maiden name as part of their surname.
Going back to the Turnbull line- there was David Turnbull the shipwright, from Dundee apparently (that's where he married Isabella Stewart in 1823). her father William was a weaver- no appreciable money to inherit there that we know of.
David Turnbull the son born 1826, who circa 1858 changed his surname to Stewart had numerous occupations, from West Indies planter, to inventor, to engineer and ship owner. He DID seem to have money, and a ship- perhaps from sellling the West Indian plantations- but I have no idea how he got them in the first place- maybe an inheritance via a childless uncle's lineage (just a guess).
He had patents registered in his name (as Mr Stewart or Mr DT Stewart) in 1859 & 1860. I used to have copied of them. They were from cotton & sugar milling machinery, and a rock crusher.
He supposedly sent his wife & kids to India in later 1864, to be there when he arrived from the West Indies. They were to try & develop more markets for his inventions. He drowned off the coast of Bombay just before he got there, apparently.
I don't know how long it took to sail to the West Indies, but a trip from UK to India via cape Town used to be, I thought, 5 to 6 months- all before the Suez Canal was opened- however, if he went to W. Indies, I am sure the rest of the family would not have owned their own boat to be able to go to India- the usual route was to cross the English channel, and go by rail as far as possible, eventually getting a boat from the bottom end of the Suez Canal to Bombay. This was about a 2 month trip, apparently.
(yes, that is Carmax Stewart- I understand negro servants in the West Indies did frequently adopt the surname of their employers. Slavery ceased 30 years beforehand, but maybe she'd been a slave. She doesn't feature in subsequent censuses, nor does Margaret Todd)
Re Edward Willmer- I did check possible marriages to Annie under spelling variations- a single L, and even Woolmer, and so far reached a blank wall. In is interesting that Annie in 1871 had a possible sister-in-law or cousin-in-law living almost next door,
I found a similar connection in 1861...
David Turnbull the shipwright: (his wife Isabella died in 1860, and is buried in David the son's family memorial at Jesmond)
in the 1861 census, he's living with his youngest son George, and daughter Isabel, in Jarrow, not far from Newcastle. Immediately next door is Helen Miller & her husband Thomas. Helen was nee Turnbull, David & Isabella's oldest surviving daughter- i.e. George & Isabel's older sister. It's just interesting that they were next door- or across the road, depending on how the house numbering went.
Both George & Isabel sign their names with Stewart as a second name, in their marriage certificates n the 1870s & 1880s, though they weren't christened with it according to the OPR's.
George & Isabel, surname always Turnbull, were godparents for one of David & Frances (now Stewart)s' children (Margaret Jessie) born 1862.
David Henry, (born 1849) and Helen or Ellen Miller (she used both names at different times) nee Turnbull , were godparents to another of David & Frances' children (Louisa, the one Annie Willmer adopted) born in 1864.
I'm about to look through some old Newcastle directories to see if David & Frances were there under which surname, if at all, when the directories were printed, between 1850 & 1865- but I'm not feeling confident as there'd be a time delay between them having to be resident, and the directory being printed. Maybe they were overseas between printings so don't appear at all...
I'll continue the next bit of info in the next frame...
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
11 Jan 2010 08:20 |
Also for info, we do like to see these things
1851
Henry Middleton 50 - station master Mary Middleton 51 David Turnbull 23 - West India planter Frances Turnbull 22 Alferd Hastings 21 (the other names shown by Ancestry do not belong in the household)
Civil parish: Wallsend County/Island: Northumberland
Name: Frances Turnbull Age: 22 Estimated birth year: abt 1829 Relation: Wife Spouse's name: David Where born: Chirton, Northumberland, England
Name: David Turnbull Age: 23 Estimated birth year: abt 1828 Relation: Son Spouse's name: Frances Father's Name: Henry Mother's Name: Mary Where born: Scotland
The original does clearly say that David is son and Frances is son's wife but there you go.
Marriages Dec 1848 MIDDLETON Frances Newcastle T 25 428 TURNBULL David White Ridley Newcastle T 25 428
|
|
Karen in the desert
|
Report
|
11 Jan 2010 08:12 |
Ian, regarding your question about Newcastle newspapers being on-line...I don't know the answer to that but I'd say it's worth phoning the Newcastle Reference Library and asking if they have a search service, you may find the cost of such a search is reasonable.
Back last year I came across a bit of a situation with an ancestor from England's north east. I phoned the Middlesbrough ref. library and found an extremely helpful woman. Considering all I had to offer were the details from the death cert and a hunch that there was some other drama, she willingly took on the search which resulted in her sending me photocopies of newspaper pages containing bankruptcy notices, a report of the death, and the Coroners report. She searched over a period of +/-5 yrs, and it didn't cost me a penny!! Now THAT'S what I call service!!
So, I'm not saying you'll be so lucky, though I hope you are - but it is certainly worth a call to the reference library in the area of your interest. You might find this website handy....newcastle.gov.uk/libraries
K
|