General Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Coincidence or what ?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
UzziAndHerDogs | Report | 14 May 2015 21:49 |
No I suppose the death dates are a little far apart to be classed as coincidence but they both died young as many grinders did. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
eRRolSheep | Report | 14 May 2015 19:04 |
I often think that coincidences are what we want to make of them. They didn't exactly die on the same date or even the same year - it is often very easy to muddy our thoughts in genealogy. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
UzziAndHerDogs | Report | 14 May 2015 18:54 |
Just another little coincidence John died 1845 James 1844 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
UzziAndHerDogs | Report | 14 May 2015 18:40 |
Gwyn John (who am I am looking) for died around 1845 no second marriages. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Gwyn in Kent | Report | 14 May 2015 18:11 |
Did either men have another later marriage? |
|||
|
Sue In Yorkshire. | Report | 14 May 2015 17:59 |
Margee, |
|||
|
UzziAndHerDogs | Report | 14 May 2015 17:54 |
Sue the Staniforths were a large family in that area. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 14 May 2015 17:46 |
But, Sue, if those names came from the 1841 remember they could have been born 1787-1791. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
eRRolSheep | Report | 14 May 2015 17:41 |
It were run bi whippets sporting flat caps. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Sue In Yorkshire. | Report | 14 May 2015 17:40 |
Well Uzzi it must be a big family cos I have found 10/11 people born abt 1791 all in Hackenthorpe,,,,, :-D :-D :-D :-D |
|||
|
maggiewinchester | Report | 14 May 2015 17:32 |
" Especially as Hackenthorpe had the Staniforth Sickle and Sythe works." |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 14 May 2015 17:24 |
Remember that ages on the 1841 census are rounded down to the nearest 5 or 0. Evidently both John and James' ages were entered as 50 so they could have been 50-54 meaning that they could easily be brothers. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
UzziAndHerDogs | Report | 14 May 2015 17:19 |
Margee my mistake I should have put 1791 ! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 14 May 2015 17:13 |
I don't understand how people born 1891 are on the 1841 census? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
maggiewinchester | Report | 14 May 2015 17:03 |
Could be brothers or cousins - if you're going to get married, and family are going to lose a day's pay - may as well have 2 of the family marrying on the same day! :-D |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
UzziAndHerDogs | Report | 14 May 2015 10:36 |
I have a John Staniforth b c 1791 in Hackenthorpe in 1841 he was a sickle grinder living at Hackenthorpe and he married 27th June 1814. As I can´t find his parents I was scooting around the 1841 census as you do and 2 doors away from him is James Staniforth bc1791 a sickle grinder ..now as most the Staniforths were sicklle makers I thought I would look into James, he also married on 27th June 1814. |
|||
Researching: |