General Chat

Exactly Joy, all their friends were invited to crawl over over 5a and therefore destroyed any possible useful evidence long before the PJ arrived.

However, if you are telling the truth your version never changes - curtains billowing - window shut - shutter jemmied - etc., etc.,

Give me one good reason why their story changed so much that is credible and I'll listen but that isn't going to happen is it?

In Kates book she says herself
That she left the Twins again on their own
to go to the Tapas bar to inform the others Madeline was missing
Everybody then went back to their apartment
and the hotel staff where informed and most of them gathered there to

So what was the point of securing it
The crime scene was already contaminated :-( :-(

Oh please.......do you remember everything 100% the same way when the thing you're trying to remember is so stressful....if so the courts would love you as a witness in any case you might ever be involved in. They're only human.......

Did the Parent go looking for her
No they never

They went Jogging the next day
While the police and volunteers searched

At least the Police looked for the child :-( :-(

And the reliable witness to that was ?? I assume the waiter ??........I'm totally guessing here but was he maybe paid for the report or just upset as maybe they didn't tip him well..........

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-489218/Gerry-McCann-played-tennis-days-Madeleine-disappeared.html


Doesn't sound like a concerned parent to me :-D



Caroline you just haven't read Kates book have you :-D

I cannot be bothered to argue with ignorance.......

Life is far too short and repetition of the truth tires me out.

If people are not prepared to read, read and read some more before regurgitating propaganda then that's just not a discussion I am willing to enter into.

There's none so blind etc.,

Really.......calling us ignorant.......why are you so for him and so against the parents. If the evidence was that reliable the UK police would have made sure it was followed up and you could be sure the other children would be in care now.

Again JoyBoroAngel they're quoting the waiter........was he paid for his comments ?? I assume he was as I'm guessing he's paid a low wage why wouldn't he want to make money out of the story.
I have read Kates book and I stand by what I said at the beginning.

As for there's none so blind etc.........just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't mean they're wrong. you seem so hell bent on hanging them on what evidence ??

As you will know having read the book
The photo of them Jogging the next day
are there to be seen for your self

Jogging would be the last thing on my mind :-(

Kates own words are mostly speculation in her book
Unlike the Policeman's that come from the official files and more factual

Can we question how people handle stress.......some will sit in a dark room crying....some will run here there and everywhere.......would I go jogging no but then I don't jog anyway :)
If she'd drunk herself silly would that be acceptable .......what about eating until she's sick...the coping list goes on and on......

Never mind jogging or eating I would be searching for my child :-(

The only thing that would be certain is telling the unvarnished truth if you are innocent of any wrongdoing and answering the questions put to you. Certainly not immediately hiring Michael Caplan QC *snorts* and Carter Ruck *snorts even more* to deflect every reasonable question which remains obfuscated or simply unanswered to this day.

So you have found them guilty on the flimsy of evidence.....one little matter innocent until proven guilty......
The last thing the police want you doing is looking for the child yourself everyone knows that.......either you get in the way or if you're guilty you can tamper with evidence......it's not rocket science.

If my Child was missing
I would still be answering those 40 odd questions
The Policeman has said
Any of the remaining money
will be going to a children's charity

So not such a bad guy

I never said he was a bad guy nor anyone was guilty, what I said was we don't know who did it. The parents acted differently than I think I would act and from the way you'd think you'd act, but you don't honestly know how you'd act until push came to shove and hopefully you never find out.
As for not answering questions.....at the end of the day they don't have to....strange attitude agreed...but they don't have to prove their innocence it's for the police to prove their guilt. Again if they're being hung drawn and quartered by some sections of the public how come their other children weren't even monitored closely let alone taken away...

I am not hang drawing and quartering anybody
I just think they are shocking
Bringing the court action in the first place
when he was one of the people

Who actually searched for their Daughter :-(

Again any police officer will tell you they don't want the parents searching.

From the very first day the story broke there was, and still is, for that matter, something about the entire episode, and especially the McCann's behaviour and rambling explanations that just does not ring true.

Watch the US program 'JudgeJudy' and you will see what I mean - she regularly makes the comment 'if it doesn't sound right then it (probably) isn't true.

Agreed, as I've said all along.....BUT......that alone doesn't make them guilty.

The police need to prove they or whom ever is guilty...not them prove their innocence.