General Chat

Hmmmm

Thanks GR for seeing sense, now everyone can see the really boring and yet it seems to someone offensive start to this thread.....not just whooshed like they hoped.

My objection to the Mail is that it continues to employ Littlejohn even though he's been proven to be a liar on many occasions. He makes things up to back up is unpleasantly extreme right wing views. Some people believe him.

They parted ways with Hopkins last year after her extreme views became too much even for them, but they defended her for several months beforehand.

The woman is vile.

BUT do you object to others making their own choice to read it .... no

Each to their own.

People can read what they like. One would hope they read critically, though, and accept that all the papers write from a particular political standpoint. And that they realise that some newspapers don't allow outright lies from their columnists and others do.

Totally agree.