Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Missing record detail - can anyone look this up fo
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Paula Moss | Report | 22 Apr 2008 12:35 |
Please can anyone help? |
|||
|
Jill 2011 (aka Warrior Princess of Cilla!) | Report | 22 Apr 2008 12:47 |
On FreeBMD if you click on the page number it should come up with the list of people marrying on that page - which hopefully would include the spouse. (FreeBMD is not 100% complete yet but 1887 probably is as most of the years before 1901 seem to be complete.) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 22 Apr 2008 12:52 |
Well, usually on Ancestry transcribed BMDs, when you find a marriage entry, you can click on the page number to view all others that were entered on the same page - but for some reason there are none others showing up. This would suggest that his spouse has been mistranscribed on Ancestry and has been put on either in the wrong quarter or page number. |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 22 Apr 2008 12:54 |
There seems to be a problem with that entry on freebmd - no other names are coming up with that page number, which is correct according to the image. |
|||
|
Paula Moss | Report | 22 Apr 2008 12:57 |
Thanks Athens |
|||
|
Paula Moss | Report | 22 Apr 2008 12:58 |
Thanks Anita - I can't get on ancestry this morning - don't understand why.... |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 22 Apr 2008 12:58 |
Aha - not sure if this helps but I've jus searched the index by taking out the quarter and just leaving the vol, page number, year and district - here's what comes up: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 22 Apr 2008 12:59 |
checking on FreeBMD that year & qtr is 47% transcribed so seems its still in progress, if you dont want to buy the cert then the next update of Freebmd may get your info |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jill 2011 (aka Warrior Princess of Cilla!) | Report | 22 Apr 2008 13:03 |
I've tried on FreeBMD putting in just the 1887 Jun Quarter and pulled up a list of all the people marrying that quarter. No Mary Davies though. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 22 Apr 2008 13:08 |
I've found something - looking on the actual indexes for 1887 June qtr there is a Mary Davies listed with vol 8b page 193 Liverpool - but she does not come up on a search of the transcribed entries on Ancestry. |
|||
|
Jill 2011 (aka Warrior Princess of Cilla!) | Report | 22 Apr 2008 13:10 |
Well there's no obvious Mary Somethings with a number even vaguely like 64 so that's not much help. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jill 2011 (aka Warrior Princess of Cilla!) | Report | 22 Apr 2008 13:18 |
Found the Mary Davies on June Q 1887 - 8b 193. So it's not her. Also double-checked James Wood for the same quarter on Ancestry just in case there were two of him but just that original one - 8b 64. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 22 Apr 2008 13:20 |
Paula, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 22 Apr 2008 13:25 |
From Lancs bmd: |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 22 Apr 2008 13:28 |
Just for general info - if you can't find an entry on freebmd, you won't find it in Ancestry's partial index as they get there info from freebmd and usually not as up to date. |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 22 Apr 2008 13:30 |
The entry for Mary Jones same details as James Wood is on the complete index on Ancestry |
|||
|
Paula Moss | Report | 22 Apr 2008 14:53 |
Glitter Baby / and all |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 22 Apr 2008 16:07 |
Seems a lot of people are having problems with Ancestry at the moment but it's working fine for me. |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 22 Apr 2008 16:08 |
If you James was born in October 1889, he would have only been 1 when the census was taken. |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 22 Apr 2008 16:20 |
Another son by 1901 and now Mary is a charwoman. A lot of the neighbours have jobs to do with the docks or ships - maybe James went to sea. Also, there is a very big gap between James junr and the new son: |