Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Boards

Quick Search

Single word search

Tools

Findmypast DNA Banner

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Lookup Please 1871 census Essex

Login to Add Reply Watch This

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Vera

Vera Report 27 Jul 2009 11:21

Have already looked up 1841...and it is on this thread....


Regards Vera

}((((*> Jeanette The Haddock <*)))){

}((((*> Jeanette The Haddock <*)))){ Report 27 Jul 2009 11:27

There isn't a male Struther/Struthers marriage to match the one I posted above....Grrrrrrrr

Vera

Vera Report 27 Jul 2009 11:28

I know that feeling Jeanette :-))

Regards Vera

Helen in Bucks

Helen in Bucks Report 27 Jul 2009 11:35

this could be the missing groom, page number possibly mistranscribed as very different from all the other page no.s in that quarter in Hartismere

ROSE Henry Hartismere 4a 619

have looked at original image and it couldb e 619 or 649 on freebmd, will have a look on Ancestry to see if its clearer

EDIT definitely 649 on Ancestry, so he is your missing groom for that marriage

}((((*> Jeanette The Haddock <*)))){

}((((*> Jeanette The Haddock <*)))){ Report 27 Jul 2009 11:35

This is driving me nuts Vera1 lol

I'm wondering if that marriage I found with the missing groom was our Emma. Then that husband died and she married again to Mr Struther. Obviously she would have married under her first married name. Either that or Mr Struther is a figment of her imagination to cover for that fact that Archie was illegitimate

}((((*> Jeanette The Haddock <*)))){

}((((*> Jeanette The Haddock <*)))){ Report 27 Jul 2009 11:45

Thanks for looking Helen :-))))) I can't find anything that would match with him either lol

Vera

Vera Report 27 Jul 2009 11:46

You might have hit the nail on the head........with the figment :-)) Thats what I have been wondering !!!!

So FRUSTRATING !!! :-)

Regards Vera

}((((*> Jeanette The Haddock <*)))){

}((((*> Jeanette The Haddock <*)))){ Report 27 Jul 2009 11:54

Dennis....the only thing I can suggest is to get Archie's marriage cert and see if a father's name is given. Also have a look at witness names for further clues

}((((*> Jeanette The Haddock <*)))){

}((((*> Jeanette The Haddock <*)))){ Report 27 Jul 2009 12:17

Funny that this bloke was in the same area at the same time though. As you can see he went on to marry Jane Blake. Mind you, his father was called Archibald too so who knows.....;-))))

1881

Archibald Struthers 31
Jane Struthers 31
Archibald Struthers 4
Joseph Struthers 2
Emily Struthers 60 (daughter????)
RG11; Piece: 418; Folio: 27; Page: 9;


Marriages Dec 1874

ALLEN John Anthony Hackney 1b 731
BARNES Fanny Hackney 1b 731
Blake Jane Hackney 1b 731
Jarvis Esther Eliza Hackney 1b 731
Struthers Archibald Hackney 1b 731

Dennis

Dennis Report 27 Jul 2009 18:57

Dear All

Thank you so much for the time you put in on this - it does appear the only way to resolve the problem is to get some certificates.

Best wishes and many thanks again.

Dennis

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2