Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Jane A Shacklock
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
FannyByGaslight | Report | 2 Oct 2012 20:14 |
PM from Olwen |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
FannyByGaslight | Report | 20 Sep 2012 22:33 |
Like what please Olwen? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Olwen | Report | 20 Sep 2012 22:15 |
I am also looking for information on Jane A Shacklock married to Samuel Black |
|||
|
ellieathome | Report | 26 Nov 2009 14:20 |
As this is your main family line i do agree with freewheeler certificates are a must have. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Freewheel | Report | 25 Nov 2009 21:50 |
You really DO need to get the child's birth cert................relying on someone else's info - however well-intentioned - can lead to many wasted hours of research. |
|||
|
Georgina | Report | 25 Nov 2009 21:28 |
I've just had to chance to look at these responses. I got Janes maiden name from someone who has been helping me research my tree. The information I had about William Samuel Black is definetly correct (age 37yrs in 1881 census) and he definetly married Jane (age 38 yrs in 1881 census) but the maiden name I'm not sure going on secondary information. The information on the children is correct. Jane was my g-g grandmother and I wanted to find some information out about her. It said on the 1881 census she was born in London. |
|||
|
ellieathome | Report | 24 Nov 2009 00:05 |
If that is the correct Mary Matilda Black then it is not Jane A Shacklock as she never married untill 1865.Mary Black also states in the census that she was born before 1865? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ellieathome | Report | 23 Nov 2009 22:50 |
Sorry for repeating freewheelers info ,but none started with Samuel Black |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Freewheel | Report | 23 Nov 2009 22:48 |
Births Mar 1842 (>99%) |
|||
|
Freewheel | Report | 23 Nov 2009 22:39 |
Georgina |
|||
|
ellieathome | Report | 23 Nov 2009 22:39 |
Tree in Ancestry says born Holloway,London No death given |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
FannyByGaslight | Report | 23 Nov 2009 22:39 |
Name: Jane Ann Cowton |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 23 Nov 2009 22:38 |
Marriages Sep 1862 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Freewheel | Report | 23 Nov 2009 22:35 |
This may be Samuel in 1861 - |
|||
|
FannyByGaslight | Report | 23 Nov 2009 22:33 |
Going on all Freewheels work then I think we arrive here? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 23 Nov 2009 22:31 |
There is a particular dearth of Shacklock-s in the London area. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
FannyByGaslight | Report | 23 Nov 2009 22:27 |
Come on freewheel.. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Freewheel | Report | 23 Nov 2009 22:27 |
MARY MATILDA BLACK |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 23 Nov 2009 22:23 |
Georgina, there's no need for "about". We have FreeBMD. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Freewheel | Report | 23 Nov 2009 22:19 |
1871 |