Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Victor Price-1911

Page 0 + 1 of 2

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. »
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

William

William Report 28 Jun 2013 12:20

I can't think why I didn't look at my personal Email Box!She sent the message as often happens on here under married name.However though I am not finding any contacts under her literal born name,I have just contacted her sister after searching for her mother's name.

However this doesn't answer my question about what has happened to her message to me and my reply?When sending a reply to a message on here,whilst it is possible to press the Draft option by mistake,the completely delete conversation option is not readily available?

I have to say really that all this has completely wasted all my time this morning as her message also contained important follow up info about her Great-Grandmother's second marriage and children from that marriage.

Regards
William Russell Jones.

William

William Report 28 Jun 2013 11:16

Thanks Dea,you would swear by all this that i'm a new member on here!I've been a member on here since 2003 and have sent quite literally thousands of private messages on here!I'll follow your suggestion and look in Draft Messages thanks.

Another thought for me to consider is that hopefully this doesn't suggest the onset of "Senior Moments"!

Regards
William Russell Jones.

Dea

Dea Report 28 Jun 2013 10:48

William,

Have you looked to see if you have sent this into draft messafes on here? - It seems more likely that you have done that rather than deleted it ?

If it has been deleted - If you look in your in box on your direct e-mail system you should see a notification to tell you that you have a personal message on Genes re-united - If you hover over it or open it, it should at least give you the name of the person who sent you the message on here.

You might then be able to find him/her on these boards or on 'trees' ?

Dea x

William

William Report 28 Jun 2013 09:36

It appears I made a huge blunder when answering a message last night.Someone saw this topic who is a descendant of the Rowley Price marriage.However when I replied it appears that instead of send it appears that I may have pressed delete instead!Could the person who sent the message resend it please?

Regards
William Russell Jones.

William

William Report 27 Jun 2013 09:35

Many thanks for the new replies,I'm giving myself a severe reprimand not just for failing to check here on any new replies but also missing the birth of Gladys Hancock Price.After all Sampson and Rachel married in 1904!The Brammer surname is one I've come across vaguely whilst looking into the Rowley and the closely associated "Clewes" family.

regards
William Russell Jones.

ErikaH

ErikaH Report 26 Jun 2013 23:02

I thought I'd missed something....lol!

Tenerife Sun

Tenerife Sun Report 26 Jun 2013 14:53

My apologies Reggie my above post should have said "along with Harold" and not "along with Stanley"

ErikaH

ErikaH Report 26 Jun 2013 14:22

Price and Rowley are common surnames in the area....................

The 'missing' child was Gladys

Not sure who Stanley is/was.............

Tenerife Sun

Tenerife Sun Report 26 Jun 2013 14:01

I understood that William thought that Victor was his relative, along with Stanley, and now knowing Victor was someone else's son was trying to find out who the missing living child was.

Interesting that victors MMN was also Rowley

ErikaH

ErikaH Report 26 Jun 2013 13:38

I have a feeling that Sampson simply didn't record the details of his child (Gladys) when filling in the census.......he thought that saying there was one was sufficient.

The column for 'status' makes specific mention of 'over-15's'.........which he may easily have misinterpreted.

ErikaH

ErikaH Report 26 Jun 2013 13:32

I think the point of the post was to ascertain Victor's parentage, which, in my opinion, has been achieved.

Tenerife Sun

Tenerife Sun Report 26 Jun 2013 13:06

We could do with a bit more info from William x

Dea

Dea Report 26 Jun 2013 12:54

'Probable marriage for the 'Brammers' ?


England & Wales, FreeBMD Marriage Index, 1837-1915 about William Brammer
Name: William Brammer
Date of Registration: Oct-Nov-Dec 1901
Registration District: Stoke upon Trent
Inferred County: Staffordshire
Volume Number: 6b
Page Number: 470
Records on Page:
Name
**William Brammer
Martha Hill
Robert Riley
**Emily Whieldon

Don't think the Gladys with them will be the right one though - age too far out?

Dea x

Tenerife Sun

Tenerife Sun Report 26 Jun 2013 12:47

There is this Gladys as 'adopted' I can't find a marriage for William and Emily Brammer

refine search back to 1911 census search results1911 address search
Name Relation Condition /
Yrs married Sex Age Birth Year Occupation Where born Image
BRAMMER, William Head Married M 36 1875 Potters Cup Jollier Stoke on Trent Staffs VIEW
BRAMMER, Emily Wife Married9 years F 32 1879 Stoke on Trent Staffs VIEW
PRICE, Gladys Adopted F 2 1909 Stoke on Trent Staffs VIEW RG number: RG14 Piece: 16557 Reference: RG14PN16557 RG78PN1023 RD361 SD2 ED9 SN37 Registration District: Stoke upon Trent Sub District: Stoke upon Trent Enumeration District: 9 Parish: Stoke upon Trent Address: 20 Market St Stoke on Trent County: Staffordshire refine search back to 1911 census search results1911 address search
© brightsolid online publishing ltd

ErikaH

ErikaH Report 26 Jun 2013 11:34

Staffordshire Marriage indexes for the years: 1869
Surname Forename(s) Surname Forename(s) Church / Register Office Registers At Reference
PRICE Samuel HANCOCK Jane Civil Marriage (Wolstanton) Stoke-On-Trent WRO/11/037.

ErikaH

ErikaH Report 26 Jun 2013 10:02

This seems pretty conclusive.........................

Staffordshire Birth indexes for the years: 1881
Surname Forename(s) Sub-District Registers At Mother's Maiden Name Reference
PRICE Sampson Tunstall Stoke-On-Trent HANCOCK TUN/084/007
Total records matching : 1.

ErikaH

ErikaH Report 26 Jun 2013 09:55

Death
Name: FRAIN, Gladys Hancock
Registration district: Stoke on Trent
County: Staffordshire
Year of registration: 1996
Month of registration: June
Date of Birth:20 November 1905
District no: 7371E
Reg no: E57F
Ent no: 267
DOR: 696

Her marriage is on freebmd.......her father's name will be on the cert

ErikaH

ErikaH Report 26 Jun 2013 09:51

It would seem more probable that the child referred to in 1911 is Gladys. A 5-year old child is more likely that a 4-month old baby to be away from its parents

Purchasing the birth cert would resolve all queries

Tenerife Sun

Tenerife Sun Report 26 Jun 2013 01:08

Re my post at 14.57 for the 1911 census for Peter and Harriet Price with son Victor. I found this marriage where Peter Price married Harriet Rowley. I think they are the parents of the Staffordhire birth record for a Victor MMN Rowley

Marriages Mar 1910 (>99%)
Lawton Samuel Wolstanton 6b 169
<<<PRICE Peter Wolstanton 6b 169
<<<Rowley Harriett Wolstanton 6b 169
Sutton Martha Wolstanton 6b 169

ErikaH

ErikaH Report 25 Jun 2013 22:47



Death
Name: PRICE, Victor
Registration district: Stoke on Trent
County: Staffordshire
Year of registration: 1995
Month of registration: February
Date of Birth:29 November 1910
District no: 7371B
Reg no: B53F
Ent no: 051
DOR: 295