Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
meefy
|
Report
|
21 Aug 2014 22:33 |
I am having an issue trying to find a marriage for this gentleman and was wondering whether anyone here can't see something I am not.
I can only find him on the 1851 census aged 37 (although its been transcribed as 27), and living with his wife Elizabeth aged 31. His two kids Frank b1846 and Charlotte c1849 are also present. James himself dies in 1860 so the trail goes cold in that direction for him.
I do have a copy of Frank's birth certificate which states his mother was an Elizabeth Strudwick formally Martin. I just cannot find a marriage between James and an Elizabeth Martin, and I know its the same Elizabeth on the census because in 1856 she gave birth to Mary Ann Strudwick and she is listed on there as formerly Martin.
Any ideas out there?
|
|
MarieCeleste
|
Report
|
21 Aug 2014 22:38 |
Hello meefy - where were they from?
|
|
Jacqueline
|
Report
|
21 Aug 2014 22:44 |
For info
1851 England, Wales & Scotland Census Transcription South Moreton, Wallingford, Berkshire, England
Print household transcription Household Members First Name Last Name Relationship Condition Gender Age Year Of Birth Occupation Charlotte Strudwick Daughter - Female 2 1849 - Image Transcription Elizabeth Strudwick Wife Married Female 31 1820 - Image Transcription James Strudwick Head Married Male 37 1814 Railway Labourer Image Transcription Frank Strudwick Son - Male 4 1847 - Image Transcription
No idea of birthplaces, as the wrong image is attached to the transcription
|
|
meefy
|
Report
|
21 Aug 2014 22:47 |
I always forget to put some informaion in my posts.
James according to the 1951 census was born in N K Sussex, which I am led to believe is not known Sussex Elizabeth is the same but N K Surrey Frank is also N K Sussex, but as I have a birth certificate, this states it is Midhurst in Sussex.
|
|
MarieCeleste
|
Report
|
21 Aug 2014 22:48 |
Just a possibility
London, England, Marriages and Banns, 1754-1921 Name: Elizabeth Smallpiece Estimated birth year: abt 1823 Age: 21 Spouse: James Strudwick - Labourer Spouse Age: 22 Record Type: Marriage Event Date: 28 Apr 1844 Parish: St Mary, Thames Ditton County: Surrey Father Name: Robert Smallpiece Spouse Father: Robert Strudwick Register Type: Bishop's Transcript
EDIT: Just realised Elizabeth was supposed to be Martin but will leave just in case.
|
|
Jacqueline
|
Report
|
21 Aug 2014 22:48 |
Ok, the next image is the one for this family
James & Frank born Sussex, Elizabeth born Surrey
|
|
Jacqueline
|
Report
|
21 Aug 2014 22:53 |
perhaps he'd been married before he met Elizabeth, and wasn't free to legalise their union
He was a few years older than her
|
|
Jacqueline
|
Report
|
21 Aug 2014 22:57 |
Have you looked for and found Elizabeth in 1841?
|
|
meefy
|
Report
|
21 Aug 2014 22:59 |
Elizabeth I also have in 1861 and it states she was born in Cobham, Surrey.
I think she remarries in 1867 to a Charles Strong, and dies in 1870. That marriage record states according to my uncle that the fathers name is William Martin and he is deceased.
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
22 Aug 2014 01:38 |
Ages for people over the age of 15 were rated downwards to the nearest 5 on the 1841 Census
James was 37 on the 1851, therefore presumably ca 27 in 1841 .......................
I wonder if one of these could be him ???????????
James Strudwick abt 1816 Surrey, England Stoke Next Guildford, Surrey Image checked ......... Baker
James Strudwick abt 1816 Sussex, England Fittleworth, Sussex Image checked ..... Bargeman
James Strudwick abt 1816 Sussex, England Cold Waltham, Sussex Image checked ........ Ag Lab
James Strudwick abt 1816 Sussex, England Kirdford, Sussex Ag Lab
dinner calls ............... if no-one has checked the last 2 when I return, I'll do it
EDIT ............... last 2 checked, ca 3:30 am
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
22 Aug 2014 03:58 |
Not much help there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Any one of those James, except possibly the Baker, could have become a railway Labourer by 1851 ............ there was lots of work building the railways, and pay was often better than, eg, for an agricultural labourer.
Just in case it helps with a possible father if a marriage registration is found ................ here are the other people in the household with each respective James
James Strudwick abt 1816 Surrey, England Stoke Next Guildford, Surrey Image checked ......... Baker
Name Age James Strudwick 60 Pork Butcher James Strudwick 25 Thomas Strudwick 20 Sarah Strudwick 55 Anna Strudwick 20
James Strudwick abt 1816 Sussex, England Fittleworth, Sussex Image checked ..... Bargeman
Name Age James Strudwick 50 Bargeman Sarah Strudwick 50 James Strudwick 25 John Strudwick 20 Lucy Strudwick 15 Mary Strudwick 14 Thomas Strudwick 12
James Strudwick abt 1816 Sussex, England Cold Waltham, Sussex Image checked ........ Ag Lab
Name Age Jonathan Stedman 69 Ag Lab Rebecca Strudwick 58 Female Servant James Strudwick 25 Mary Ann Strudwick 20 no occupation shown
James Strudwick abt 1816 Sussex, England Kirdford, Sussex Ag Lab
Name Age Richard Dunn 42 Farmer Jane Dunn 33 John Dunn 9 Charlott Dunn 7 Richard Dunn 5 George Dunn 3 James Strudwick 25 George Hellyer 14 Ag Lab Harriet Gale 16 Female Servant
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
22 Aug 2014 05:00 |
I find myself intrigued with thsi James Strudwick ............... even though he says born in Surrey.
look where he is living!
1841 Census
Name: James Strudwick Age: 29 Estimated birth year: abt 1812 Gender: Male Where born: Surrey, England Civil Parish: Cobham <<<<<<<<<<<< Hundred: Elmbridge (Second Division) County/Island: Surrey Country: England
Registration district: Epsom Sub-registration district: Leatherhead Neighbors: View others on page
James Strudwick 29 Ag Lab Eliza Strudwick 30 James Strudwick 5 Charles Strudwick 4
Charles was omitted form the List, and is shown as living all by himself, but he is definitely in the household, so I've added him.
I have tried and tried, but I cannot find them on a alter census
Also living in Cobham on the 1841 is the following Eliza Martin ...............
Name: Eliza Martin Age: 20 Estimated birth year: abt 1821 Gender: Female Where born: Surrey, England Civil Parish: Cobham Hundred: Elmbridge (Second Division) County/Island: Surrey Country: England
Registration district: Epsom Sub-registration district: Leatherhead
Ths Hicks 50 Ag Lab Mary Hicks 45 Jno Hicks 15 Ths Hicks 9 Eliza Martin 20 (no occupation shown) Willm Martin 2weeks
Again, I can't trace William Martin b. 1841.
Am I stretching it ?????????????????????????????????
|
|
Gritty
|
Report
|
22 Aug 2014 12:03 |
Is this his death?
JAMES STRUDWICK Death quarter 3 Death year 1860 District READING County Berkshire Volume 2C Page 196
His burial lists his DOB as 1817:
James Strudwick Birth year 1817 Death year 1860 Burial day 10 Burial month Sep Burial year 1860 Age at death 43 Church St John the Baptist Place South Moreton Residence South Moreton County Berkshire Record set Berkshire Burial Index
Oh, hold on- the inquest reported in the Reading Mercury 08 September 1860 lists his age at death as 47 (fatal rail accident)
|
|
Jacqueline
|
Report
|
22 Aug 2014 12:46 |
http://www.genesreunited.co.uk/boards/board/ancestors/thread/1247415
and a linked one
http://www.genesreunited.co.uk/boards/board/ancestors/thread/1284011
|
|
meefy
|
Report
|
22 Aug 2014 19:10 |
Helen - I am of the belief that his death was in 1860. On the 1861 census Elizabeth has been widowed and all the children are present with her.
I have been messaged with an article from the Berkshire Chronicle for a James Strudwick in 1849 being injured whilst working on the railway. This was whilst working on the Reigate line in Surrey.
|
|
Gritty
|
Report
|
22 Aug 2014 19:26 |
The burial looks to fit as the residence is listed as South Moreton where the family were living in 1851. I've pm'd the inquest article in case you don't have it.
|
|
meefy
|
Report
|
22 Aug 2014 19:36 |
Ahh!! So you are the same Helen who PM'd me. I wasn't sure sure because on here it says Helen with one surname but on the pm it says Helen with a different surname
Thank you once again for this.
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
22 Aug 2014 19:48 |
meefy
could you please delete the two surnames for Helen
GR tells you that only your Board name will be used in all communications, but they do not carry out that promise!
I'm pretty certain that Helen would like at least one of those names kept out of the public domain.
|
|
meefy
|
Report
|
22 Aug 2014 20:30 |
OK many apologies for that I have edited this now!
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
23 Aug 2014 04:11 |
meefy
it's OK ................ most people don't realise that that is what happens!
I discovered by accident when someone reported a post I had made, and he gloatingly sent me a copy of the pm that GR had sent to him .......... and there for him to see was my maiden name. It is a little unusual, and therefore would be easy to trace me if he so wanted (he was being rather malicious at that time)
Their rationale was that this was the name on my Account, and therefore they used it.
My surname in my Personal Details is now ...................... In Canada :-D
I find it very worrying that pms are now going out under 2 different surnames ............. but we just have to keep our fingers crossed that that cause no problems.
|