Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
wade and green
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Shirley | Report | 28 Jul 2015 10:35 |
Hi |
|||
|
Andrew | Report | 28 Jul 2015 10:39 |
|
|||
|
Andrew | Report | 28 Jul 2015 10:42 |
This might be her birth |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 28 Jul 2015 10:47 |
her birth name was Wade |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 28 Jul 2015 10:47 |
Thanks Andy . From her death it did say she was 45. Which would make her birth ye a r approx 1886? |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 28 Jul 2015 10:48 |
Possible baptism but you really need the marriage cert for her father's name: |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 28 Jul 2015 10:50 |
So wasn't sure if the 1888 Burnley ethel wade was her. She seems to have added two years on on the census. |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 28 Jul 2015 10:50 |
??????? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 28 Jul 2015 10:53 |
Here's the image for the baptism I posted above: |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 28 Jul 2015 10:53 |
Think that was because I couldn't find an ethel wade in 1886 born in Burnley but seems I wasn't searching properly. Thanks for that. :-) |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 28 Jul 2015 10:58 |
Shirley - I'm not seeing a registration to match that baptism, there is another Ethel Wade born 1890 (parents Barnabas and Mary Ann), probably too young to have married 1905. |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 28 Jul 2015 10:58 |
Hi |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 28 Jul 2015 11:01 |
No - you're not doing anything wrong. |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 28 Jul 2015 11:01 |
Think I tried lbmd too....Think this was why I was confused. But now I know that there is an ethel wade born 1886 that may be her. I will either go and check the church register or get the marriage cert. Just to make sure. Thank you :-) |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 28 Jul 2015 11:02 |
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 28 Jul 2015 11:03 |
Shirley - would you get more info from the church register than is on the keepsafe link I posted above? (just curious). |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 28 Jul 2015 11:04 |
The first birth of the names as per 1901 registered as WADE is HUBERT's in 1892 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 28 Jul 2015 11:05 |
Lancashire Birth indexes for the years: 1869 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 28 Jul 2015 11:06 |
Marie Celeste...does this mean she was registered as Allen...maybe Reuben and Elizabeth e th were not married at time of birth ...strange though as she wasn't oldest child.... |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 28 Jul 2015 11:07 |
Shirley - I think Jacqueline has cracked it, above. |