Find Ancestors

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Page 2 + 1 of 3

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: July 2005 Posts: 12,337 Send Message	alviegal	Report	28 Jun 2016 12:41
Member Since: July 2005 Posts: 12,337 Send Message	You may be correct about the "Mcs and the Macs" being 2 different families, Charles. It also makes perfect sense that they would possibly leave the 3 young children with family members at home, especially with the very high infant mortality rate in India at the time. I wonder why they would name another son John though if the John born 1822 was still living. This may be one of these situations where you never find out the answer, I'm afraid due to the lack of records at the time and also the extremely common name. :-( :-( :-(

All site material is owned by Findmypast Limited and should not be used without prior permission.

Any views expressed in message boards and members notes represent the opinions of the author and do not represent the opinions of Findmypast Limited.