Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Census Look-up Please

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

RosieUK

RosieUK Report 7 Oct 2006 09:45

Hello Maureen / Rose Thanks for sticking with me. This is what we have on the marriage certificate from the year 1876. Charles HARRIS 21 bacherlor - Horsekeeper Father Samuel HARRIS - Horsekeeper Marian Maria HAMMOND 20 spinster - father John HAMMOND - tailor. (note here: The birth certificate for Marian states father's name as William Jonathan HAMMOND). Witnesses: Henry FRANCIS & Emma Laura HAMMOND. (Note: To date no record has been found for Emma Laura HAMMOND). The address for the couple is just simply: Emmanuel. They were married in Emmanuel Parish Church, Camberwell, Surrey. We do know of one older child i.e. Charles William HARRIS. I do not hold a birth cert for him but born circa 1884/85 and probably somewhere around the Bethnal Green/Newington/Lambeth areas. I have worked for a long time on the HARRIS family and the only sure reference to them is with the mistranscribed name of HERRIS in Chelsea on the 1901. Note: after 1900's the family (at least Charles & Marian) remained in the Chelsea area until death. Again, thanks,

GlitterBaby

GlitterBaby Report 7 Oct 2006 10:59

Good morning Janie, 1881 there is this entry which I keep coming back to - names and ages are a good match but not the place of birth for Marian or the occupation of Charles. Name: Charles Harris Age: 23 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1858 Relation: Head Spouses's Name: Marian Gender: Male Where Born: Middx City, Middlesex, England Civil parish: St Mary Islington County/Island: London Country: England Street address: 13 Richmond Villas Condition as to marriage: Married Occupation: Traveller (Provision Trade) Registration district: Islington Sub registration district: Islington East ED, institution, or vessel: 39 Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Charles Harris 23 Marian Harris 24 born Taplow, Buckinghamshire Emily Page 18 servant Source Citation: Class: RG11; Piece: 261; Folio: 41; Page: 34; Line: ; GSU roll: 1341057 Presume you will have ruled this one out. Maureen

GlitterBaby

GlitterBaby Report 7 Oct 2006 11:14

1891 also keep coming back to this one but the occupation is wrong Name: Charles Harris Age: 38 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1853 Relation: Head Spouses's Name: Maryan Gender: Male Where Born: Bethnal Green, London, England Civil parish: Edmonton Ecclesiastical parish: All Saints County/Island: Middlesex Country: England Registration district: Edmonton Sub registration district: Edmonton ED, institution, or vessel: 12 Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Annie L Harris 13 born Finsbury Charles Harris 38 Charles Harris 10 born Finsbury Emily F Harris 3 Maryan Harris 36 born Old Ford, London Willie Harris 1 Source Citation: Class: RG12; Piece: 1083; Folio 25; Page 42; GSU roll: 6096193 Marian can be spelt so many different ways but this is best match on ages

RosieUK

RosieUK Report 7 Oct 2006 12:19

Morning Maureen / Rose Thank you for your 'finds', I am mulling them over at the moment and will come back later on this afternoon. Cheers.

RosieUK

RosieUK Report 7 Oct 2006 13:13

Hello Maureen I am looking at the 1881 entry first: This is difficult. The names are correct. Place of birth for Charles is correct. However, Buckinghamshire is way off for the place of birth of Marian. The years of birth are not quite right but not too far out. Also, I would have thought it unlikely that they would have had a servant unless she was a visitor. Are there any children mentioned here? 1891: Looking at Charles again the birth year is slightly out but the place of birth is correct again. Could this be the same couple that you found on the 1881? With regard Marian, I looked up where the birth mentioned i.e. 'Old Ford London' could be and Wikipedia told me Tower Hamlets - Bow, so that is not a great distance from Newington. Now the children. There is a Charles born 1881, but we know that the child named 'Charles' in the family I am looking for was born about c1884/5. Could it be that one child died and they named another with the same name? I also note that this family has a boy called 'Willie' aged 1. but the Charles and Marian I am looking for had a William born a couple of years later in 1986. This is tough. I don't know. On the other hand, how many couples could there be in the same time period called Charles and Marian and the Charles is consistently from Bethnal Green?

GlitterBaby

GlitterBaby Report 7 Oct 2006 14:43

Janie, Have sent you the image for 1891 family. Now found the same family in 1881and sent you the details. Not convinced that any of the families are correct. Maureen

RosieUK

RosieUK Report 7 Oct 2006 17:34

Hello Maureen, Well my thoughts against the one family being wrong is that there is a son called Charles but his year of birth does not match with the Charles I know of in my family. However, it is possible that one child died and they had another using the same name - especially as Dad's name was Charles. However, the plus side is that in the address is 8 Paradise Street Lambeth and I KNOW that my family were living at 21 Paradise Street in 1893 as they had a child at that address. I am going to send off for a certificate of one of the children on the 1891 census to confirm the mother's maiden name. I have sent you a PM. Many thanks.