Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1881/1891/1901 census Search Please
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
The Bag | Report | 27 Jun 2005 14:45 |
|
Not sure what you mean by your last reply. Husbands for who? Rosalie? Rosalia's husband will be a Mr Beelaby- You can look that up on 1837 Jess * where does Constance fit in. tell us everything you know about her,now, before we start! |
|||
|
Simon | Report | 27 Jun 2005 14:50 |
|
Hi, I was hoping to find some info on the tebbs or pickup something in the census for an address for Ethel and Rosalie once they were married. I think 1837 may be too early as she was still alive I assume in the 1950-60's. |
|||
|
The Bag | Report | 27 Jun 2005 14:52 |
|
Having discovered she wasn't born until 1892 we are not going to find her married on a census the latest address that can be found is 75 Well Banks Sleaford Jess |
|||
|
Simon | Report | 27 Jun 2005 14:54 |
|
Constance Mary TURRELL (Nee Fuller) Daughter of Ethel FULLER (Nee TEBB) and CHARLES FULLER. ETHEL and CHARLES married in 1908. I am assuming she was born after marriage... |
|||
|
The Bag | Report | 27 Jun 2005 14:59 |
|
all of which happened well after the last census . you will have to buy some credits for 1837 on line and look yourself. If i can just say Simon, you didn't really help us to help you. More info at the start would have been helpful and also the relationship between the people you were looking for, they were two different generations for a start! No one minds helping, but it feels a bit like the info was classified!!Please tell people at the outset what you know! Jess |
|||
|
Simon | Report | 27 Jun 2005 15:04 |
|
Hi, Thanks for the info. Unfortunatley I am still piecing lots of stray ends together (as you may have noticed) there's no imediate relations availble to qualify/validate the info sadly but dead impressed with how much you have helped. Sorry if it looked liked it was classified but alas I I have very little to go on (i.e no birth dates, places etc) but thanks again for your assistance its very much appreciated. |
|||
|
The Bag | Report | 27 Jun 2005 15:09 |
|
Simon, I appreciate what you are saying but look at what you posted originally and the info that you DID add when asked. Did we know from the outset that they were siblings? or that Constance was the daughter of one of them ? Or any idea of where and when anyof this happened? I was in 1861 searching when you popped up with the date of 1960! The info that you posted at 14.54 should have been in you initial request, not over an hour later! Jess |
|||
|
Simon | Report | 27 Jun 2005 15:12 |
|
Hi, Yes point taken. I'll make sure its much clearer next time. Thanks Again Simon |
|||