Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Mistranscription !!

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Kathlyn

Kathlyn Report 20 Jul 2008 17:01

Thanks Kath.

KathleenBell

KathleenBell Report 20 Jul 2008 16:52

If it's the right certificate it should say on it "widow of George"

Kath. x

Kathlyn

Kathlyn Report 20 Jul 2008 16:50

Thanks to you both, my thoughts exactly. I will bite the bullet and send for the cert.

Kathlyn

KathleenBell

KathleenBell Report 20 Jul 2008 16:49

Even in 1913 I would imagine that lots of names were spelt however the person recording it thought it should be spelt.

Kath. x

Liz 47

Liz 47 Report 20 Jul 2008 16:43

If the informant just stated the name, the registrar may have spelt it as he/she thought it was spelt.
Liz

Kathlyn

Kathlyn Report 20 Jul 2008 16:37

I have found the death of my great grandfather who`s name was George Massie, he died in 1909 and the records show this way of spelling Massie.

Great grandmother Mary died after him, but I have trawled through from 1909 to 1938 and have found nothing. BUT, I thought I would try another way of spelling and used Massey. I found a Mary Massey, right place, right age at death in 1913, but would the spelling have gone unchallenged, ie....is this my Mary???

Thought much appreciated.

kathlyn