Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Symbol

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 3 Feb 2015 20:33

well, you have just proved us wrong in our beliefs!!


I bet you are not the only one.


I still wonder whether it was an accident :-D

The Meercat

The Meercat Report 3 Feb 2015 18:12

Ha ha could you see the original certificate I sent you then.

I just sent for it and got it so as far as i knew you could get the original like I did,
I surely can't be the only one who as sent for the original and got it.
:-D :-D

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 3 Feb 2015 17:47

Meercat


That is interesting!!


I wonder if it was an accident that the original certificate was not "taken our of circulation"?

The Meercat

The Meercat Report 3 Feb 2015 12:20

Yes I got the original for my dads birth registered 5th may 1922.
At the side it says registered under the legitimacy act 1926 on 18th can't read the month 1929 and a signature.

Edit.
checked dads reregistered birth and it says 18th april 1929,So on the original the word I can't read is April

June

June Report 3 Feb 2015 01:28

Thanks very much for that information

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 3 Feb 2015 01:00

In other words, this is the original registration ...........


Births Jun 1924 (>99%)

Nind John Smith Windsor 2c 722 ?


looking at the image, you can see that the extra information is written at the bottom of the page



and this looks like the amended version ..................


Births Mar 1938 (>99%)

Nind John Smith Windsor 2c 680




you'd have to buy this second certificate to find out why the amendment.

June

June Report 3 Feb 2015 00:41

My relative was born John Nind in 1924 the fathers name was Frederick and the Mother Gladys. The mothers maiden name Smith. The parents were married at the time of the birth. The marriage did not last and the mother married a George Holbrook in 1937. John Nind somehow became john Holbrook and I am trying to find out if this was a legal name change or adoption as on original birth at the bottom of the page his name appears and beside it it says "see M38
Thanks for any advice and help !!

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 2 Feb 2015 23:53

The Meercat ......................


do you mean that there was an amended certificate yet you still got the original???


That's what this thread is about.


Otherwise, we all get the original full length birth certificate.

Jacqueline

Jacqueline Report 2 Feb 2015 22:32

????????

The Meercat

The Meercat Report 2 Feb 2015 11:48

I ordered and got the original birth cerificate of my fathers birth on the 18th april 2007.

June

June Report 1 Feb 2015 15:51

Thanks very much.

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it Report 1 Feb 2015 15:47

if you order a birth cert you will get the amended one not the original registration

Cynthia

Cynthia Report 1 Feb 2015 15:36

Hello June and welcome to the Community boards.


(I'll let June know how to find her replies) :-)

Kense

Kense Report 31 Jan 2015 08:48

A similar question was answered in this thread:

http://www.genesreunited.co.uk/boards/board/genealogy_chat/thread/1348595

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 30 Jan 2015 21:40

probably a re-registration of the birth .....................


often this is an indication that the parents may not have been married at the time of the birth but later married


OR an error might have been made at the time of the birth





If you are looking on freebmd, you should be able to click on "see M'38" and see what the change was.

June

June Report 30 Jan 2015 19:37

I have found the birth of a relative in 1924 but it has "see M'38 " could this have been an adoption? Thanks for any help